<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: DockFun! &#8211; For those of you who&#8217;ve wished you could have more than one Dock in Mac OS X</title>
	<atom:link href="http://osxdaily.com/2006/11/29/dockfun-for-those-of-you-whove-wished-you-could-have-more-than-one-dock-in-mac-os-x/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://osxdaily.com/2006/11/29/dockfun-for-those-of-you-whove-wished-you-could-have-more-than-one-dock-in-mac-os-x/</link>
	<description>News, tips, software, reviews, and more for Mac OS X, iPhone, iPad</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 19:31:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: OsakanOne</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2006/11/29/dockfun-for-those-of-you-whove-wished-you-could-have-more-than-one-dock-in-mac-os-x/#comment-146</link>
		<dc:creator>OsakanOne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2006 14:24:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/2006/11/29/dockfun-for-those-of-you-whove-wished-you-could-have-more-than-one-dock-in-mac-os-x/#comment-146</guid>
		<description>One dock is more than enough, since there&#039;s no point in launching applications from it (clutters up your task management abilities. More apps = more clutter in the dock hence multiple desktops in the next version).

Quicksilver&#039;s my key launcher of choice but if someone could come up with an application which lets me plant launch widgets, RSS feeds and whatnot in something that drops from below the MenuBar or organize tasks into specific groups or launch macros, I&#039;d happily drop $20 for it provided it&#039;s Always Ontop and unoffensive to the eye.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One dock is more than enough, since there&#8217;s no point in launching applications from it (clutters up your task management abilities. More apps = more clutter in the dock hence multiple desktops in the next version).</p>
<p>Quicksilver&#8217;s my key launcher of choice but if someone could come up with an application which lets me plant launch widgets, RSS feeds and whatnot in something that drops from below the MenuBar or organize tasks into specific groups or launch macros, I&#8217;d happily drop $20 for it provided it&#8217;s Always Ontop and unoffensive to the eye.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: subcorpus</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2006/11/29/dockfun-for-those-of-you-whove-wished-you-could-have-more-than-one-dock-in-mac-os-x/#comment-133</link>
		<dc:creator>subcorpus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2006 07:26:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/2006/11/29/dockfun-for-those-of-you-whove-wished-you-could-have-more-than-one-dock-in-mac-os-x/#comment-133</guid>
		<description>quicksilver is the wa to go ...
cant live without it ...
try it ... wont regert it ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>quicksilver is the wa to go &#8230;<br />
cant live without it &#8230;<br />
try it &#8230; wont regert it &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geoff Taylor</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2006/11/29/dockfun-for-those-of-you-whove-wished-you-could-have-more-than-one-dock-in-mac-os-x/#comment-132</link>
		<dc:creator>Geoff Taylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2006 04:25:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/2006/11/29/dockfun-for-those-of-you-whove-wished-you-could-have-more-than-one-dock-in-mac-os-x/#comment-132</guid>
		<description>Why?  Quicksilver, Launchbar, Butler... try one of those!

Forget multiple docks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why?  Quicksilver, Launchbar, Butler&#8230; try one of those!</p>
<p>Forget multiple docks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2006/11/29/dockfun-for-those-of-you-whove-wished-you-could-have-more-than-one-dock-in-mac-os-x/#comment-130</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 20:12:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/2006/11/29/dockfun-for-those-of-you-whove-wished-you-could-have-more-than-one-dock-in-mac-os-x/#comment-130</guid>
		<description>Overflow is better for this type of thing.

http://www.stuntsoftware.com/Overflow/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Overflow is better for this type of thing.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.stuntsoftware.com/Overflow/" rel="nofollow">http://www.stuntsoftware.com/Overflow/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesse Curry</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2006/11/29/dockfun-for-those-of-you-whove-wished-you-could-have-more-than-one-dock-in-mac-os-x/#comment-128</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesse Curry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 19:53:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/2006/11/29/dockfun-for-those-of-you-whove-wished-you-could-have-more-than-one-dock-in-mac-os-x/#comment-128</guid>
		<description>I just use quicksilver, I&#039;m almost to the point where I won&#039;t even need the dock for anything.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just use quicksilver, I&#8217;m almost to the point where I won&#8217;t even need the dock for anything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2006/11/29/dockfun-for-those-of-you-whove-wished-you-could-have-more-than-one-dock-in-mac-os-x/#comment-127</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 19:44:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/2006/11/29/dockfun-for-those-of-you-whove-wished-you-could-have-more-than-one-dock-in-mac-os-x/#comment-127</guid>
		<description>The more docks the better!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The more docks the better!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MacNewsOnline.com- Mac News, Macintosh Articles, Mac Rumors, Software Reviews &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The More Docks the better!</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2006/11/29/dockfun-for-those-of-you-whove-wished-you-could-have-more-than-one-dock-in-mac-os-x/#comment-126</link>
		<dc:creator>MacNewsOnline.com- Mac News, Macintosh Articles, Mac Rumors, Software Reviews &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The More Docks the better!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 19:34:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/2006/11/29/dockfun-for-those-of-you-whove-wished-you-could-have-more-than-one-dock-in-mac-os-x/#comment-126</guid>
		<description>[...] The other day I became annoyed with how many icons I was starting to accumulate in my Mac OS X Dock (Application Launcher). I thought to myself, geez it would be really handy to be able to switch between a couple of predefined Docks. A few googles later and I stumbled upon a killer-app, DockFun!. Does this sounds like you? Check out DockFun. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The other day I became annoyed with how many icons I was starting to accumulate in my Mac OS X Dock (Application Launcher). I thought to myself, geez it would be really handy to be able to switch between a couple of predefined Docks. A few googles later and I stumbled upon a killer-app, DockFun!. Does this sounds like you? Check out DockFun. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2006/11/29/dockfun-for-those-of-you-whove-wished-you-could-have-more-than-one-dock-in-mac-os-x/#comment-125</link>
		<dc:creator>M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 19:28:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/2006/11/29/dockfun-for-those-of-you-whove-wished-you-could-have-more-than-one-dock-in-mac-os-x/#comment-125</guid>
		<description>Err the definition of a killer app is one that makes the cost of the entire hardware platform on which to run the application worthwhile. Whilst cool this application is not a killer app. Visicalc, that was a killer app.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Err the definition of a killer app is one that makes the cost of the entire hardware platform on which to run the application worthwhile. Whilst cool this application is not a killer app. Visicalc, that was a killer app.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave M.</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2006/11/29/dockfun-for-those-of-you-whove-wished-you-could-have-more-than-one-dock-in-mac-os-x/#comment-124</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave M.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 15:51:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/2006/11/29/dockfun-for-those-of-you-whove-wished-you-could-have-more-than-one-dock-in-mac-os-x/#comment-124</guid>
		<description>I just tried this program and almost all the rest of what they offer. I found that DockFun and StickyWindows were rather buggy. I had to force quit DockFun once, and StickyWindows seemed to go away at every attempt to do what the video they offer did.

I was considering buying the entire suite they offered, but with it crashing like it was for me, I simply removed the demo&#039;s.

They look like cool apps, but they need work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just tried this program and almost all the rest of what they offer. I found that DockFun and StickyWindows were rather buggy. I had to force quit DockFun once, and StickyWindows seemed to go away at every attempt to do what the video they offer did.</p>
<p>I was considering buying the entire suite they offered, but with it crashing like it was for me, I simply removed the demo&#8217;s.</p>
<p>They look like cool apps, but they need work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cona Marf</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2006/11/29/dockfun-for-those-of-you-whove-wished-you-could-have-more-than-one-dock-in-mac-os-x/#comment-123</link>
		<dc:creator>Cona Marf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 07:15:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/2006/11/29/dockfun-for-those-of-you-whove-wished-you-could-have-more-than-one-dock-in-mac-os-x/#comment-123</guid>
		<description>Useful but that icon is ugly!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Useful but that icon is ugly!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 1/3 queries in 0.002 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 288/289 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via cdn.osxdaily.com

Served from: osxdaily.com @ 2013-05-18 13:30:34 -->