<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Squid Manager &#8211; web proxy cache manager for Mac OS X</title>
	<atom:link href="http://osxdaily.com/2009/09/13/squid-manager-web-proxy-cache-manager-for-mac-os-x/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://osxdaily.com/2009/09/13/squid-manager-web-proxy-cache-manager-for-mac-os-x/</link>
	<description>News, tips, software, reviews, and more for Mac OS X, iPhone, iPad</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 01:29:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maynard Handley</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2009/09/13/squid-manager-web-proxy-cache-manager-for-mac-os-x/#comment-187368</link>
		<dc:creator>Maynard Handley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2011 03:39:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=555#comment-187368</guid>
		<description>Both the previous commenters miss the point. 
Consider, for example, a household with multiple computers --- and iPhones and iPads are computers. 
When different computers access the same web resources, they hit the squid server and all (apart from the first) load those resources a lot faster and without consuming external bandwidth.
I have all the computers in my household configured to go through a single squid proxy and the increase is speed and reduction in bandwidth is noticeable. One particularly obvious place this shows up is in OS X system updates. The first 200MB update will take a few minutes, but the update on every other machine will download in a few seconds --- because its is being pulled in from the squid cache.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Both the previous commenters miss the point.<br />
Consider, for example, a household with multiple computers &#8212; and iPhones and iPads are computers.<br />
When different computers access the same web resources, they hit the squid server and all (apart from the first) load those resources a lot faster and without consuming external bandwidth.<br />
I have all the computers in my household configured to go through a single squid proxy and the increase is speed and reduction in bandwidth is noticeable. One particularly obvious place this shows up is in OS X system updates. The first 200MB update will take a few minutes, but the update on every other machine will download in a few seconds &#8212; because its is being pulled in from the squid cache.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Annie Rice</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2009/09/13/squid-manager-web-proxy-cache-manager-for-mac-os-x/#comment-96532</link>
		<dc:creator>Annie Rice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 21:02:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=555#comment-96532</guid>
		<description>i don&#039;t understand this is a proxy for mac, or a mac proxy, then why does it not change your internet address? i agree with coward this squid sucks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i don&#8217;t understand this is a proxy for mac, or a mac proxy, then why does it not change your internet address? i agree with coward this squid sucks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anonymous coward</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2009/09/13/squid-manager-web-proxy-cache-manager-for-mac-os-x/#comment-96530</link>
		<dc:creator>anonymous coward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 19:21:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=555#comment-96530</guid>
		<description>the way you present it, you sound like it is better than what any modern browser offers, i.e. caching.

Unless you plan to make the computer running squid an &quot;internet service provider&quot; in your LANs, i honestly dont see the point in installing one more service at your mac.

//2 cents</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the way you present it, you sound like it is better than what any modern browser offers, i.e. caching.</p>
<p>Unless you plan to make the computer running squid an &#8220;internet service provider&#8221; in your LANs, i honestly dont see the point in installing one more service at your mac.</p>
<p>//2 cents</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>


<!-- W3 Total Cache: Page cache debug info:
Engine:             disk (enhanced)
Key:                2009/09/13/squid-manager-web-proxy-cache-manager-for-mac-os-x/feed/_index.html
Caching:            disabled
Reject reason:      user agent is rejected
Status:             not cached
Creation Time:      0.078s
Header info:
X-Pingback:         http://osxdaily.com/xmlrpc.php
Last-Modified:      Mon, 13 Feb 2012 01:29:35 GMT
ETag:               "05e6f7291eb0b0598dea2a796acd23c5"
X-Powered-By:       W3 Total Cache/0.9.1.3
Link:               <http://wp.me/ps4An-8X>; rel=shortlink
Content-Type:       text/xml; charset=UTF-8
-->
