Comments on: iTunes Equalizer – the Best iTunes Equalizer settings

By: kath

kath — Fri, 04 May 2012 13:57:18 +0000

Fantastic, thankyou!!!!

By: Davi

Davi — Thu, 12 Apr 2012 19:32:01 +0000

Thats is the greatest supidy think I ever saw im my hole life! The equalizer works for a kind of speaker to avoid “holes” in the sound and make it sounds better for YOURS EARS… THIS showed curve is called “fletcher munson curve” but it is wrong… To much high frequencies… Sounds like “sandy and glass”… Try to follow the fletcher munson if you are a noob with sounding enginnering…

By: helen

helen — Mon, 26 Mar 2012 17:21:35 +0000

Just use amarra if you really what to, preset ones tho, they have very good eq the signal even stays bit transparent testing it through my weiss int202 i wouldn’t even bother changing the eq myself you are supose to hear it like it was intended by the singer/ engineer, amarras eq is very subtle but you definitely don’t need to be messing about with eq u will just **** it up!!!

By: Woz

Woz — Wed, 22 Feb 2012 02:57:30 +0000

Are you crazy??!? this eq causes so much distortion. And if your not picking any of it up its probably cause your speakers/headphones are too poo. Sorry.

Go use ableton or fruity loops and see it thru a graphic visualiser and youl see that its actually really easy to create electronic distortion eispecially with a crazy mofo eq like this.

Who ever says this eq is good or perfect (if such a thing exists..) – i hope your ears fry.

Good day.

By: raamesh

raamesh — Fri, 10 Feb 2012 06:05:12 +0000

to complete your statement, equalizer is needed to compensate the artifacts caused by electronics ans spekers/headphones

By: Radim

Radim — Fri, 03 Feb 2012 01:24:16 +0000

really perfect!!! Thanks

By: jonchan

jonchan — Sat, 28 Jan 2012 05:24:44 +0000

well the beats aren’t exactly the most discerning of headphones with bloated mid-bass

By: Electronicer

Electronicer — Tue, 13 Dec 2011 09:36:34 +0000

Oops, I meant -3. D:

By: Electronicer

Electronicer — Tue, 13 Dec 2011 09:35:23 +0000

I listen to mostly electronic music, so this works out just fine for me, except I turned the first… um… slider… down to either -1.5 or 3.
And I don’t get the whole thing about not working well on headphones or that it only works for cheap headphones. I have Bose earphones and it sounds awesome.

By: KV

KV — Tue, 13 Dec 2011 09:25:05 +0000

I agree with this statement.

By: Ben Smith

Ben Smith — Mon, 12 Dec 2011 18:10:32 +0000

I find the rock preset to be the best well-rounded preset. Gives the bass and treble a nice punch, and greatly improves the quality of compressed audio.

By: adsver

adsver — Fri, 09 Dec 2011 19:16:38 +0000

perfect!!!!))) bass))

By: Will Turner

Will Turner — Wed, 07 Dec 2011 20:45:24 +0000

Yes – after years of playing rock music with various 100 watt marshalls and blackface/silverface fender combo’s cranked right up the top end is really lacking these days haha.

By: Will Turner

Will Turner — Wed, 07 Dec 2011 20:43:35 +0000

EQ’s (in the home at least) are designed to correct for speakers flaws. So settings are specific to one signal chain (speakers, amp, preamp and D/A convertors all play a part in how the end result sounds).

If EQing to improve the sound on your hi end hifi or similar, here’s something to think about.

The sound engineer that recorded/mastered the track your listening to has already EQ’d everything and it’s likely their job, hobby and love since they were able to hear – so EQing to make their mix sound better is actually rather insulting to the dude and also a bold claim. Are you really that sure of yourself, to claim that your ears are better than a professionals likely with decades of experience..?

By: gaming headset

gaming headset — Fri, 18 Nov 2011 00:16:46 +0000

Hello, i think that i saw you visited my web site thus i came to go back the desire?.I am attempting to in finding issues to improve my web site!I guess its ok to use some of your ideas!!