<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Monitoring CPU Usage on your Mac &#8211; a better top command</title>
	<atom:link href="http://osxdaily.com/2009/10/06/monitoring-cpu-usage-on-your-mac-a-better-top-command/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://osxdaily.com/2009/10/06/monitoring-cpu-usage-on-your-mac-a-better-top-command/</link>
	<description>News, tips, software, reviews, and more for Mac OS X, iPhone, iPad</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 19:31:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Watch Disk Use, CPU, and Load Average via Command Line</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2009/10/06/monitoring-cpu-usage-on-your-mac-a-better-top-command/#comment-128793</link>
		<dc:creator>Watch Disk Use, CPU, and Load Average via Command Line</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Oct 2010 12:16:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=988#comment-128793</guid>
		<description>[...] on it&#8217;s own and it&#8217;ll spit out a one-off look at the system stats, or you can just use the top command for similar [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] on it&#8217;s own and it&#8217;ll spit out a one-off look at the system stats, or you can just use the top command for similar [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MrPaul</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2009/10/06/monitoring-cpu-usage-on-your-mac-a-better-top-command/#comment-99334</link>
		<dc:creator>MrPaul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 00:05:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=988#comment-99334</guid>
		<description>I wish the OS X (BSD) version of top was more like the one that comes with ubuntu.  With that I can press the number &quot;1&quot; and it will display the CPU usage for each CPU/core.  You can also press the letter &quot;i&quot; and it will hide all idle processes to clean up the display a bit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wish the OS X (BSD) version of top was more like the one that comes with ubuntu.  With that I can press the number &#8220;1&#8243; and it will display the CPU usage for each CPU/core.  You can also press the letter &#8220;i&#8221; and it will hide all idle processes to clean up the display a bit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: martin</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2009/10/06/monitoring-cpu-usage-on-your-mac-a-better-top-command/#comment-97448</link>
		<dc:creator>martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 12:08:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=988#comment-97448</guid>
		<description>iostat -n0 -w1

This should be significantly less CPU intensive and provide precisely what you&#039;re looking for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>iostat -n0 -w1</p>
<p>This should be significantly less CPU intensive and provide precisely what you&#8217;re looking for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Urs Eppenberger</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2009/10/06/monitoring-cpu-usage-on-your-mac-a-better-top-command/#comment-97260</link>
		<dc:creator>Urs Eppenberger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 08:27:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=988#comment-97260</guid>
		<description>Sampling every second is not useful for me. Therefore I use

top -s 5 -u

which cuts the overall CPU usage of top by 80% too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sampling every second is not useful for me. Therefore I use</p>
<p>top -s 5 -u</p>
<p>which cuts the overall CPU usage of top by 80% too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Eccles</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2009/10/06/monitoring-cpu-usage-on-your-mac-a-better-top-command/#comment-97060</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Eccles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 16:49:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=988#comment-97060</guid>
		<description>The segmentation fault seems to occur with the -F, not the -R.

Save a few keystrokes and use &quot;-u&quot; which is &quot;an alias equivalent to: -o cpu -O time&quot;. Close enough.

top -R -u

works OK and cuts the CPU usage of top by about 80%.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The segmentation fault seems to occur with the -F, not the -R.</p>
<p>Save a few keystrokes and use &#8220;-u&#8221; which is &#8220;an alias equivalent to: -o cpu -O time&#8221;. Close enough.</p>
<p>top -R -u</p>
<p>works OK and cuts the CPU usage of top by about 80%.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: addi</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2009/10/06/monitoring-cpu-usage-on-your-mac-a-better-top-command/#comment-97058</link>
		<dc:creator>addi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 15:09:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=988#comment-97058</guid>
		<description>A friend tested the command for me on his machine (also snow leopard) ... &#039;top -F&#039; works for him without segfault.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A friend tested the command for me on his machine (also snow leopard) &#8230; &#8216;top -F&#8217; works for him without segfault.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin Pitts</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2009/10/06/monitoring-cpu-usage-on-your-mac-a-better-top-command/#comment-97057</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin Pitts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 14:54:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=988#comment-97057</guid>
		<description>s/-R/-F/

sigh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>s/-R/-F/</p>
<p>sigh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin Pitts</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2009/10/06/monitoring-cpu-usage-on-your-mac-a-better-top-command/#comment-97056</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin Pitts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 14:54:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=988#comment-97056</guid>
		<description>Segfault here as well, isolated to the use of the -R switch. Snow Leopard thing?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Segfault here as well, isolated to the use of the -R switch. Snow Leopard thing?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: addi</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2009/10/06/monitoring-cpu-usage-on-your-mac-a-better-top-command/#comment-97055</link>
		<dc:creator>addi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 14:04:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=988#comment-97055</guid>
		<description>~$ top -F
Segmentation fault

wtf??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>~$ top -F<br />
Segmentation fault</p>
<p>wtf??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DistortedLoop</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2009/10/06/monitoring-cpu-usage-on-your-mac-a-better-top-command/#comment-97054</link>
		<dc:creator>DistortedLoop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 14:00:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=988#comment-97054</guid>
		<description>What I don&#039;t like about Top is that is that you can never see every item on the list.  It only displays as many processes as will fit in the shell window.  Is there a way to make it scrollable?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I don&#8217;t like about Top is that is that you can never see every item on the list.  It only displays as many processes as will fit in the shell window.  Is there a way to make it scrollable?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 1/3 queries in 0.003 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 289/289 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via cdn.osxdaily.com

Served from: osxdaily.com @ 2013-05-19 03:34:32 -->