<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mac OS X 10.7 delayed?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://osxdaily.com/2010/04/14/mac-os-x-10-7-delayed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://osxdaily.com/2010/04/14/mac-os-x-10-7-delayed/</link>
	<description>News, tips, software, reviews, and more for Mac OS X, iPhone, iPad</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 21:37:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lijst met nieuwe mogelijke functies in Mac OS X 10.7 &#124; Multidevos</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2010/04/14/mac-os-x-10-7-delayed/#comment-156458</link>
		<dc:creator>Lijst met nieuwe mogelijke functies in Mac OS X 10.7 &#124; Multidevos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2011 20:59:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=3873#comment-156458</guid>
		<description>[...] showing up in server logs for well over a year, but beyond John Gruber saying the release was delayed, nobody knows anything. Anyone that tells you otherwise is full of it, Apple has an amazingly tight [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] showing up in server logs for well over a year, but beyond John Gruber saying the release was delayed, nobody knows anything. Anyone that tells you otherwise is full of it, Apple has an amazingly tight [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Apple working on &#8220;revolutionary&#8221; Mac OS X 10.7 feature &#8211; is it Cloud computing? - OS X Daily</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2010/04/14/mac-os-x-10-7-delayed/#comment-108379</link>
		<dc:creator>Apple working on &#8220;revolutionary&#8221; Mac OS X 10.7 feature &#8211; is it Cloud computing? - OS X Daily</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 01:21:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=3873#comment-108379</guid>
		<description>[...] is working on a &#8220;revolutionary&#8221; new Mac OS X 10.7 feature, according to a new job posting on Apple.com: We are looking for a senior software engineer [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is working on a &#8220;revolutionary&#8221; new Mac OS X 10.7 feature, according to a new job posting on Apple.com: We are looking for a senior software engineer [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Apple developing ad supported Operating System? - OS X Daily</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2010/04/14/mac-os-x-10-7-delayed/#comment-107313</link>
		<dc:creator>Apple developing ad supported Operating System? - OS X Daily</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 17:30:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=3873#comment-107313</guid>
		<description>[...] the operating system is fascinating too. Will any of these &#8216;features&#8217; be mandatory in Mac OS X 10.7? I hope not. I don&#8217;t know about anyone else but I&#8217;d much rather just pay for an OS than [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the operating system is fascinating too. Will any of these &#8216;features&#8217; be mandatory in Mac OS X 10.7? I hope not. I don&#8217;t know about anyone else but I&#8217;d much rather just pay for an OS than [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: trololol</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2010/04/14/mac-os-x-10-7-delayed/#comment-107125</link>
		<dc:creator>trololol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 00:11:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=3873#comment-107125</guid>
		<description>screw you gus and your genuine macs, i have a hackintosh and when 10.7 comes out Im gonna install it ok bai.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>screw you gus and your genuine macs, i have a hackintosh and when 10.7 comes out Im gonna install it ok bai.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yehoshua</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2010/04/14/mac-os-x-10-7-delayed/#comment-104930</link>
		<dc:creator>yehoshua</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 17:53:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=3873#comment-104930</guid>
		<description>mac osx 10.7 might as well come out soon, when i buy a macbook pro i want it to be at least 10.7/10.8 even though 10.8 might take another 5 years or so...
there is a bad thing about apple, everybody noticed how when jobs took a vacation once, apple&#039;s earning plummeted, but when he came back they almost duplicated... what will happen when jobs retires?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mac osx 10.7 might as well come out soon, when i buy a macbook pro i want it to be at least 10.7/10.8 even though 10.8 might take another 5 years or so&#8230;<br />
there is a bad thing about apple, everybody noticed how when jobs took a vacation once, apple&#8217;s earning plummeted, but when he came back they almost duplicated&#8230; what will happen when jobs retires?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: another Tim</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2010/04/14/mac-os-x-10-7-delayed/#comment-104031</link>
		<dc:creator>another Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jun 2010 18:32:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=3873#comment-104031</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been a dedicated Mac user since the 80s.  Although I have an iPhone and an iPod, I&#039;ve been saddened by Jobs&#039; and thus Apple (Computer) Inc&#039;s deterioration of interest in the Mac brand ever since the iPod became popular.

I saw the writing on the wall when OSX got delayed because of the iPhone.  Without OSX there would be no IOS.  It&#039;s sad to see baby slapping mommy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been a dedicated Mac user since the 80s.  Although I have an iPhone and an iPod, I&#8217;ve been saddened by Jobs&#8217; and thus Apple (Computer) Inc&#8217;s deterioration of interest in the Mac brand ever since the iPod became popular.</p>
<p>I saw the writing on the wall when OSX got delayed because of the iPhone.  Without OSX there would be no IOS.  It&#8217;s sad to see baby slapping mommy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: phoenix</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2010/04/14/mac-os-x-10-7-delayed/#comment-103668</link>
		<dc:creator>phoenix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2010 17:33:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=3873#comment-103668</guid>
		<description>small urges? hmm so why you reading news about new version of OS X? :P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>small urges? hmm so why you reading news about new version of OS X? <img src='http://cdn.osxdaily.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pedro</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2010/04/14/mac-os-x-10-7-delayed/#comment-103151</link>
		<dc:creator>Pedro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 10:56:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=3873#comment-103151</guid>
		<description>You should upgrade. 10.6 is a lot  faster and stable then the previous versions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You should upgrade. 10.6 is a lot  faster and stable then the previous versions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2010/04/14/mac-os-x-10-7-delayed/#comment-103150</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 10:11:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=3873#comment-103150</guid>
		<description>Snow Leopard made a lot of under-the-hood changes that need time to bed in for developers, and it&#039;s also now a highly polished and finessed platform - it&#039;s stacks up very well against the nearest competition (Windows 7) and there really isn&#039;t any pressing need to change it any time soon.

I&#039;m guessing 10.7 is a couple of years away at least, and that&#039;s probably the way it ought to be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Snow Leopard made a lot of under-the-hood changes that need time to bed in for developers, and it&#8217;s also now a highly polished and finessed platform &#8211; it&#8217;s stacks up very well against the nearest competition (Windows 7) and there really isn&#8217;t any pressing need to change it any time soon.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m guessing 10.7 is a couple of years away at least, and that&#8217;s probably the way it ought to be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kuba</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2010/04/14/mac-os-x-10-7-delayed/#comment-102345</link>
		<dc:creator>Kuba</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2010 13:19:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=3873#comment-102345</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t mind 10.6 being around for a while so that projects like MacPorts, and the upstream, could catch up. 10.6 broke a lot of things in the free software world, and given limited manpower it will take a while to fix.

Things like wxWindows and Gimp/GTK simply don&#039;t work natively via MacPorts right now, even though they did work just fine on 10.5. Some other things are kinda-broken too, for example Octave + aquaterm is starting up X11 for no good reason when you plot, even when aquaterm is compiled as a native quartz client.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t mind 10.6 being around for a while so that projects like MacPorts, and the upstream, could catch up. 10.6 broke a lot of things in the free software world, and given limited manpower it will take a while to fix.</p>
<p>Things like wxWindows and Gimp/GTK simply don&#8217;t work natively via MacPorts right now, even though they did work just fine on 10.5. Some other things are kinda-broken too, for example Octave + aquaterm is starting up X11 for no good reason when you plot, even when aquaterm is compiled as a native quartz client.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2010/04/14/mac-os-x-10-7-delayed/#comment-102173</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 May 2010 09:27:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=3873#comment-102173</guid>
		<description>Note that this was intentional too. Before 10.4 Apple had been releasing every year and developers were freaking out because the APIs and platform were changing so fast. They intentionally slowed down to release every 2 years to let developers get situated.

I wouldn&#039;t be surprised if they let 10.6 hang around for 3 years to get people onboard the GCD technology and 64bit bandwagon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Note that this was intentional too. Before 10.4 Apple had been releasing every year and developers were freaking out because the APIs and platform were changing so fast. They intentionally slowed down to release every 2 years to let developers get situated.</p>
<p>I wouldn&#8217;t be surprised if they let 10.6 hang around for 3 years to get people onboard the GCD technology and 64bit bandwagon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dane</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2010/04/14/mac-os-x-10-7-delayed/#comment-101804</link>
		<dc:creator>Dane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 01:45:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=3873#comment-101804</guid>
		<description>tiger was released 29 April 2005, leopard was released 26 October 2007.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>tiger was released 29 April 2005, leopard was released 26 October 2007.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dane</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2010/04/14/mac-os-x-10-7-delayed/#comment-101803</link>
		<dc:creator>Dane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 01:41:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=3873#comment-101803</guid>
		<description>The Tiger 4 year part i mean...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Tiger 4 year part i mean&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dane</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2010/04/14/mac-os-x-10-7-delayed/#comment-101802</link>
		<dc:creator>Dane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 01:40:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=3873#comment-101802</guid>
		<description>uumm... thats not true.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>uumm&#8230; thats not true.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seth</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2010/04/14/mac-os-x-10-7-delayed/#comment-101331</link>
		<dc:creator>Seth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 May 2010 17:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=3873#comment-101331</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t expect 10.7 top be out until later 2012, possibly 2013, because Remeber, although this may not happen again, Tiger was Apple&#039;s flagship OS for 4 years, and if that&#039;s also going to be the case for Snow Leopard, then I still wouldn&#039;t be surprised if it was 2013 right now and apple released Mac OS X 10.6.11.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t expect 10.7 top be out until later 2012, possibly 2013, because Remeber, although this may not happen again, Tiger was Apple&#8217;s flagship OS for 4 years, and if that&#8217;s also going to be the case for Snow Leopard, then I still wouldn&#8217;t be surprised if it was 2013 right now and apple released Mac OS X 10.6.11.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 1/3 queries in 0.003 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 347/348 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via cdn.osxdaily.com

Served from: osxdaily.com @ 2013-05-21 19:54:41 -->