Comments on: New vs Old: MacBook Pro Benchmarks compare the Core 2 Duo 13″, Core i5/i7 15″ and 17″ models http://osxdaily.com/2010/04/19/new-vs-old-macbook-pro-benchmarks-compare-the-core-2-duo-13-core-i5i7-15-and-17-models/ News, tips, software, reviews, and more for Mac OS X, iPhone, iPad Tue, 18 Jun 2013 21:04:11 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: laptop shoping http://osxdaily.com/2010/04/19/new-vs-old-macbook-pro-benchmarks-compare-the-core-2-duo-13-core-i5i7-15-and-17-models/#comment-104398 laptop shoping Thu, 24 Jun 2010 13:56:15 +0000 http://osxdaily.com/?p=3955#comment-104398 [...] Apple, meaning power was going to be slightly harder. thankfully OSX Daily had been there for me [1] allowing me to plot Price, against benchmark. According to the benchmark for Loupie’s mac [...] [...] Apple, meaning power was going to be slightly harder. thankfully OSX Daily had been there for me [1] allowing me to plot Price, against benchmark. According to the benchmark for Loupie’s mac [...]

]]> By: Mac OS X 10.6.4 available for download - OS X Daily http://osxdaily.com/2010/04/19/new-vs-old-macbook-pro-benchmarks-compare-the-core-2-duo-13-core-i5i7-15-and-17-models/#comment-103700 Mac OS X 10.6.4 available for download - OS X Daily Tue, 15 Jun 2010 22:22:39 +0000 http://osxdaily.com/?p=3955#comment-103700 [...] 5 yet, this software update handles that for you. The update comes in at a whopping 639.1 MB on my MacBook Pro 2010 model which makes for a pretty hefty download, but on another Mac right next to me the download is [...] [...] 5 yet, this software update handles that for you. The update comes in at a whopping 639.1 MB on my MacBook Pro 2010 model which makes for a pretty hefty download, but on another Mac right next to me the download is [...]

]]> By: Skippy http://osxdaily.com/2010/04/19/new-vs-old-macbook-pro-benchmarks-compare-the-core-2-duo-13-core-i5i7-15-and-17-models/#comment-103425 Skippy Fri, 11 Jun 2010 08:42:17 +0000 http://osxdaily.com/?p=3955#comment-103425 thanks for these numbers, however I would really like to know how the Macbook Pros compare against the Macbook as well. thanks for these numbers, however I would really like to know how the Macbook Pros compare against the Macbook as well.

]]> By: Dennis http://osxdaily.com/2010/04/19/new-vs-old-macbook-pro-benchmarks-compare-the-core-2-duo-13-core-i5i7-15-and-17-models/#comment-101037 Dennis Mon, 26 Apr 2010 05:17:26 +0000 http://osxdaily.com/?p=3955#comment-101037 Too bad these weren't taken in the 64 bit mode... my macbook pro with the i5 2.4 scored a 5637 in 64 bit mode Too bad these weren’t taken in the 64 bit mode… my macbook pro with the i5 2.4 scored a 5637 in 64 bit mode

]]> By: Gaming on the MacBook Pro Core i5 gets a big boost from the GT 330m: FPS Benchmarks - OS X Daily http://osxdaily.com/2010/04/19/new-vs-old-macbook-pro-benchmarks-compare-the-core-2-duo-13-core-i5i7-15-and-17-models/#comment-100930 Gaming on the MacBook Pro Core i5 gets a big boost from the GT 330m: FPS Benchmarks - OS X Daily Thu, 22 Apr 2010 22:03:28 +0000 http://osxdaily.com/?p=3955#comment-100930 [...] files in Transmit for MacThe best MySQL Database manager for Mac OS X? SequelPro might be itNew vs Old: MacBook Pro Benchmarks compare the Core 2 Duo 13″, Core i5/i7 15″ and 17&#82...Amazing iPhone to iPad upgrade [...] [...] files in Transmit for MacThe best MySQL Database manager for Mac OS X? SequelPro might be itNew vs Old: MacBook Pro Benchmarks compare the Core 2 Duo 13″, Core i5/i7 15″ and 17&#82…Amazing iPhone to iPad upgrade [...]

]]> By: Kevin http://osxdaily.com/2010/04/19/new-vs-old-macbook-pro-benchmarks-compare-the-core-2-duo-13-core-i5i7-15-and-17-models/#comment-100822 Kevin Tue, 20 Apr 2010 04:10:14 +0000 http://osxdaily.com/?p=3955#comment-100822 thats right on for what it should be for the 64 bit version, mine is the i5 2.4 and i got 5637 (completely stock with no upgrades or changes) thats right on for what it should be for the 64 bit version, mine is the i5 2.4 and i got 5637 (completely stock with no upgrades or changes)

]]> By: Kevin http://osxdaily.com/2010/04/19/new-vs-old-macbook-pro-benchmarks-compare-the-core-2-duo-13-core-i5i7-15-and-17-models/#comment-100821 Kevin Tue, 20 Apr 2010 04:08:06 +0000 http://osxdaily.com/?p=3955#comment-100821 Too bad these weren't taken in the 64 bit mode... my macbook pro with the i5 2.4 scored a 5637 in 64 bit mode Too bad these weren’t taken in the 64 bit mode… my macbook pro with the i5 2.4 scored a 5637 in 64 bit mode

]]> By: Macorama http://osxdaily.com/2010/04/19/new-vs-old-macbook-pro-benchmarks-compare-the-core-2-duo-13-core-i5i7-15-and-17-models/#comment-100814 Macorama Tue, 20 Apr 2010 00:37:42 +0000 http://osxdaily.com/?p=3955#comment-100814 Yea it is kind of ancient... my GeekBench score is 2800 on a Core 2 Duo :\ Yea it is kind of ancient… my GeekBench score is 2800 on a Core 2 Duo :\

]]> By: Macorama http://osxdaily.com/2010/04/19/new-vs-old-macbook-pro-benchmarks-compare-the-core-2-duo-13-core-i5i7-15-and-17-models/#comment-100812 Macorama Tue, 20 Apr 2010 00:28:34 +0000 http://osxdaily.com/?p=3955#comment-100812 I think the above scores are averaged like GeekBench usually does. Yruoc might have an SSD drive and 8gb of RAM for all we know. Personally I think real world benchmarks are better than the GeekBench/XBench type scores, I'd rather see how it does in Photoshop, iTunes imports, video ripping, etc. I think the above scores are averaged like GeekBench usually does. Yruoc might have an SSD drive and 8gb of RAM for all we know.

Personally I think real world benchmarks are better than the GeekBench/XBench type scores, I’d rather see how it does in Photoshop, iTunes imports, video ripping, etc.

]]> By: Brad http://osxdaily.com/2010/04/19/new-vs-old-macbook-pro-benchmarks-compare-the-core-2-duo-13-core-i5i7-15-and-17-models/#comment-100810 Brad Mon, 19 Apr 2010 23:59:06 +0000 http://osxdaily.com/?p=3955#comment-100810 Wow, I want to get one now. To bad I don't have $1500...maybe in a couple of months. Wow, I want to get one now.

To bad I don’t have $1500…maybe in a couple of months.

]]> By: Eliza http://osxdaily.com/2010/04/19/new-vs-old-macbook-pro-benchmarks-compare-the-core-2-duo-13-core-i5i7-15-and-17-models/#comment-100806 Eliza Mon, 19 Apr 2010 21:49:09 +0000 http://osxdaily.com/?p=3955#comment-100806 that is really fast that is really fast

]]> By: yojenga http://osxdaily.com/2010/04/19/new-vs-old-macbook-pro-benchmarks-compare-the-core-2-duo-13-core-i5i7-15-and-17-models/#comment-100795 yojenga Mon, 19 Apr 2010 17:09:39 +0000 http://osxdaily.com/?p=3955#comment-100795 i mean i5 who bothers. i mean i5

who bothers.

]]> By: yojenga http://osxdaily.com/2010/04/19/new-vs-old-macbook-pro-benchmarks-compare-the-core-2-duo-13-core-i5i7-15-and-17-models/#comment-100794 yojenga Mon, 19 Apr 2010 17:09:18 +0000 http://osxdaily.com/?p=3955#comment-100794 15 on the 13" ...you wish. Expect 4 hours of battery life. Bleh. 15 on the 13″

…you wish. Expect 4 hours of battery life. Bleh.

]]> By: Cory http://osxdaily.com/2010/04/19/new-vs-old-macbook-pro-benchmarks-compare-the-core-2-duo-13-core-i5i7-15-and-17-models/#comment-100787 Cory Mon, 19 Apr 2010 16:09:41 +0000 http://osxdaily.com/?p=3955#comment-100787 This makes the C2D chip seem so ancient, there's no other PC laptop that still uses it, and now Apple puts it in a 'new' model, what a bad idea! It's about to be EOL'd if it hasn't been already. Still holding out for the i5 13"..... This makes the C2D chip seem so ancient, there’s no other PC laptop that still uses it, and now Apple puts it in a ‘new’ model, what a bad idea! It’s about to be EOL’d if it hasn’t been already.

Still holding out for the i5 13″…..

]]> By: yruoc http://osxdaily.com/2010/04/19/new-vs-old-macbook-pro-benchmarks-compare-the-core-2-duo-13-core-i5i7-15-and-17-models/#comment-100784 yruoc Mon, 19 Apr 2010 14:16:05 +0000 http://osxdaily.com/?p=3955#comment-100784 I have the 15" i5 2.53GHz. I just ran Geekbench x64 and got 5849. I have the 15″ i5 2.53GHz. I just ran Geekbench x64 and got 5849.

]]>