<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gaming on the MacBook Pro Core i5 gets a big boost from the GT 330m: FPS Benchmarks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://osxdaily.com/2010/04/22/gaming-on-the-macbook-pro-core-i5-gets-a-big-boost-from-the-gt-330m-fps-benchmarks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://osxdaily.com/2010/04/22/gaming-on-the-macbook-pro-core-i5-gets-a-big-boost-from-the-gt-330m-fps-benchmarks/</link>
	<description>News, tips, software, reviews, and more for Mac OS X, iPhone, iPad</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 05:38:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raj</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2010/04/22/gaming-on-the-macbook-pro-core-i5-gets-a-big-boost-from-the-gt-330m-fps-benchmarks/#comment-323924</link>
		<dc:creator>Raj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 10:10:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=4061#comment-323924</guid>
		<description>I am planning to buy MACPRO I5.Any one can suggest whether i can go for mac or not?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am planning to buy MACPRO I5.Any one can suggest whether i can go for mac or not?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2010/04/22/gaming-on-the-macbook-pro-core-i5-gets-a-big-boost-from-the-gt-330m-fps-benchmarks/#comment-172647</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Feb 2011 19:34:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=4061#comment-172647</guid>
		<description>i have a mackbook pro with i5 and starcraft 2 runs very good such as world of warcraft the only trouble i could find with other games is the compatibilities issues for example i cant run counter strike 1.6, tibia, lineage, ragnarok , and other games that have some years on the market all new games should be able to run on mac. cheers
 pd   i know my english sux but i gave it a try :D hope its useful</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i have a mackbook pro with i5 and starcraft 2 runs very good such as world of warcraft the only trouble i could find with other games is the compatibilities issues for example i cant run counter strike 1.6, tibia, lineage, ragnarok , and other games that have some years on the market all new games should be able to run on mac. cheers<br />
 pd   i know my english sux but i gave it a try <img src='http://cdn.osxdaily.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' />  hope its useful</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M.S.R.</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2010/04/22/gaming-on-the-macbook-pro-core-i5-gets-a-big-boost-from-the-gt-330m-fps-benchmarks/#comment-148076</link>
		<dc:creator>M.S.R.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2010 16:39:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=4061#comment-148076</guid>
		<description>Well, I don&#039;t think anyone here is complaining about the macbook pros per say. We all end up going apple for the design and MAC OSX. However the comments on the hardware is completely true. It is just a simple matter of comparison that really can&#039;t be argued with. E.G. The Vaio Z series from sony has every single internal component better than any of the MAC computers.

13&quot; screen
icore 5 with the optional upgrade to icore 7
128GB SSD drive
4GB memory
optical drive (DVD RW) (I think possible blue ray option)
NVIDIA 330M (1GB VRAM) (1600x900 display)
3 x USB, audio out, HDMI out, etc

and this at a starting price of $1699.

This is 100 less than the macbook pro. The $2199 MBP model has the NVIDIA 300M (512MB VRAM). Taking that into consideration. If you look up the performance of this GPU you will find that yes you can play games &quot;fine&quot; but it is definitely no excellent. Which obviously means that it isn&#039;t a gaming machine and will have to use low settings for the next generation of games.

Note that even the imacs generally come with the icore 3 rather than 5. 

So why do I buy macs? Because I prefer the over all experience compared to windows systems. I can still hope for apple to strive to keep up more closely to the recent hardware advances right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I don&#8217;t think anyone here is complaining about the macbook pros per say. We all end up going apple for the design and MAC OSX. However the comments on the hardware is completely true. It is just a simple matter of comparison that really can&#8217;t be argued with. E.G. The Vaio Z series from sony has every single internal component better than any of the MAC computers.</p>
<p>13&#8243; screen<br />
icore 5 with the optional upgrade to icore 7<br />
128GB SSD drive<br />
4GB memory<br />
optical drive (DVD RW) (I think possible blue ray option)<br />
NVIDIA 330M (1GB VRAM) (1600&#215;900 display)<br />
3 x USB, audio out, HDMI out, etc</p>
<p>and this at a starting price of $1699.</p>
<p>This is 100 less than the macbook pro. The $2199 MBP model has the NVIDIA 300M (512MB VRAM). Taking that into consideration. If you look up the performance of this GPU you will find that yes you can play games &#8220;fine&#8221; but it is definitely no excellent. Which obviously means that it isn&#8217;t a gaming machine and will have to use low settings for the next generation of games.</p>
<p>Note that even the imacs generally come with the icore 3 rather than 5. </p>
<p>So why do I buy macs? Because I prefer the over all experience compared to windows systems. I can still hope for apple to strive to keep up more closely to the recent hardware advances right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hamza</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2010/04/22/gaming-on-the-macbook-pro-core-i5-gets-a-big-boost-from-the-gt-330m-fps-benchmarks/#comment-130386</link>
		<dc:creator>Hamza</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Nov 2010 10:37:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=4061#comment-130386</guid>
		<description>I love Gaming like Star Craft 2 and Warcraft 3, SO what do you think it is better to buy a MBP i5 or another one with Windows 7 with high video memory. 
No I use the old black MacBook but I feel bored because I can&#039;t play heavy game anymore even Microsoft office is to slow when you have a little bit big data for excel for example. Should I buy a Windows 7 laptop&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love Gaming like Star Craft 2 and Warcraft 3, SO what do you think it is better to buy a MBP i5 or another one with Windows 7 with high video memory.<br />
No I use the old black MacBook but I feel bored because I can&#8217;t play heavy game anymore even Microsoft office is to slow when you have a little bit big data for excel for example. Should I buy a Windows 7 laptop&gt;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Obvioustroll</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2010/04/22/gaming-on-the-macbook-pro-core-i5-gets-a-big-boost-from-the-gt-330m-fps-benchmarks/#comment-130262</link>
		<dc:creator>Obvioustroll</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Nov 2010 20:02:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=4061#comment-130262</guid>
		<description>No, private servers do an architecture check to verify compliance with Windows standards.  MBP&#039;s can&#039;t be used on them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, private servers do an architecture check to verify compliance with Windows standards.  MBP&#8217;s can&#8217;t be used on them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GDR</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2010/04/22/gaming-on-the-macbook-pro-core-i5-gets-a-big-boost-from-the-gt-330m-fps-benchmarks/#comment-104678</link>
		<dc:creator>GDR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2010 15:16:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=4061#comment-104678</guid>
		<description>Hi guys
I am going to buy MacBook Pro 2010 I7 version. Is it possible to play private servers of WOW on this masterpiece?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi guys<br />
I am going to buy MacBook Pro 2010 I7 version. Is it possible to play private servers of WOW on this masterpiece?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2010/04/22/gaming-on-the-macbook-pro-core-i5-gets-a-big-boost-from-the-gt-330m-fps-benchmarks/#comment-103549</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jun 2010 00:04:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=4061#comment-103549</guid>
		<description>John makes a very good point. This whole test is very fishy, and the facts just dont add up. First off, the test is done under Windows 7. It is impossible to use the 9400M processor under Windows. The only option is the 9600GT. Not to mention the fact that it&#039;s comparing a new generation&#039;s dedicated chip to the old generation&#039;s integrated chip. In other words, they never used the old Macbook Pro&#039;s dedicated card. So these results are 100% unreliable as a performance metric.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John makes a very good point. This whole test is very fishy, and the facts just dont add up. First off, the test is done under Windows 7. It is impossible to use the 9400M processor under Windows. The only option is the 9600GT. Not to mention the fact that it&#8217;s comparing a new generation&#8217;s dedicated chip to the old generation&#8217;s integrated chip. In other words, they never used the old Macbook Pro&#8217;s dedicated card. So these results are 100% unreliable as a performance metric.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Appleseed</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2010/04/22/gaming-on-the-macbook-pro-core-i5-gets-a-big-boost-from-the-gt-330m-fps-benchmarks/#comment-103436</link>
		<dc:creator>John Appleseed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2010 13:38:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=4061#comment-103436</guid>
		<description>I reiterate: why are you comparing a motherboard GPU to a discrete GPU?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I reiterate: why are you comparing a motherboard GPU to a discrete GPU?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Appleseed</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2010/04/22/gaming-on-the-macbook-pro-core-i5-gets-a-big-boost-from-the-gt-330m-fps-benchmarks/#comment-101109</link>
		<dc:creator>John Appleseed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2010 20:18:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=4061#comment-101109</guid>
		<description>Why are you comparing the previous motherboard GPU to the latest discrete GPU?

Surely you should be comparing benchmarks between the previous discrete GPU against the latest one.

In other words: NVIDIA GeForce 9600M GT vs GeForce GT 330m</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why are you comparing the previous motherboard GPU to the latest discrete GPU?</p>
<p>Surely you should be comparing benchmarks between the previous discrete GPU against the latest one.</p>
<p>In other words: NVIDIA GeForce 9600M GT vs GeForce GT 330m</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: annomyns343</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2010/04/22/gaming-on-the-macbook-pro-core-i5-gets-a-big-boost-from-the-gt-330m-fps-benchmarks/#comment-101053</link>
		<dc:creator>annomyns343</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2010 13:24:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=4061#comment-101053</guid>
		<description>I still use a single core (centrino 1.7 ghz) whith a Ati x300 (64mb) so these things to me are blazing fast not antiques.Dell inspiron 6000. and this is my primary computer. 

and it still plays the latest games (very low).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I still use a single core (centrino 1.7 ghz) whith a Ati x300 (64mb) so these things to me are blazing fast not antiques.Dell inspiron 6000. and this is my primary computer. </p>
<p>and it still plays the latest games (very low).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brian</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2010/04/22/gaming-on-the-macbook-pro-core-i5-gets-a-big-boost-from-the-gt-330m-fps-benchmarks/#comment-100936</link>
		<dc:creator>brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2010 00:57:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=4061#comment-100936</guid>
		<description>I am confused, are you complaining or complimenting? You just bought a product you&#039;re putting down? What?

FWIW, I run games fine on my old MacBook Pro...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am confused, are you complaining or complimenting? You just bought a product you&#8217;re putting down? What?</p>
<p>FWIW, I run games fine on my old MacBook Pro&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Sheriff</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2010/04/22/gaming-on-the-macbook-pro-core-i5-gets-a-big-boost-from-the-gt-330m-fps-benchmarks/#comment-100932</link>
		<dc:creator>The Sheriff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 22:52:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=4061#comment-100932</guid>
		<description>3x better is fantastic, and 52FPS is good for WoW on a laptop, but note it;s only 800x600. 

I&#039;m glad the performance is so much better than it&#039;s predecessor, but Apple is still giving the shaft to MBP buyers and shipping ancient video cards lacking adequate VRAM.

If you buy the MBP 13&quot; you&#039;re getting a double shaft: antiquated C2D processor + ancient crappy video card. And they charge $1500+ for these??? 

MBP&#039;s should not be confused with gaming systems, and the MBP 13&quot; shouldn&#039;t be labeled &#039;Pro&#039; considering it performs only 10% better than the cheap plastic MacBook that also has an antiquated processor.

I just got a Core i5 MBP 15&quot;, but I am not under the illusion that it&#039;s a gaming laptop, for games I play my XBox 360, my MBP is for work. The Core i5 is SMOKING for daily tasks especially compared to the C2D chip from 2007 it replaced and it&#039;s a very worthy upgrade, but don&#039;t expect it to compete with your roommates $900 PC Core i7 laptop with 1GB of VRAM and 8GB of RAM.

Apples and oranges people, Apple&#039;s and oranges. Apple doesn&#039;t prioritize gaming as much as usability because Steve Jobs and Co are CREATIVES, not gamers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>3x better is fantastic, and 52FPS is good for WoW on a laptop, but note it;s only 800&#215;600. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m glad the performance is so much better than it&#8217;s predecessor, but Apple is still giving the shaft to MBP buyers and shipping ancient video cards lacking adequate VRAM.</p>
<p>If you buy the MBP 13&#8243; you&#8217;re getting a double shaft: antiquated C2D processor + ancient crappy video card. And they charge $1500+ for these??? </p>
<p>MBP&#8217;s should not be confused with gaming systems, and the MBP 13&#8243; shouldn&#8217;t be labeled &#8216;Pro&#8217; considering it performs only 10% better than the cheap plastic MacBook that also has an antiquated processor.</p>
<p>I just got a Core i5 MBP 15&#8243;, but I am not under the illusion that it&#8217;s a gaming laptop, for games I play my XBox 360, my MBP is for work. The Core i5 is SMOKING for daily tasks especially compared to the C2D chip from 2007 it replaced and it&#8217;s a very worthy upgrade, but don&#8217;t expect it to compete with your roommates $900 PC Core i7 laptop with 1GB of VRAM and 8GB of RAM.</p>
<p>Apples and oranges people, Apple&#8217;s and oranges. Apple doesn&#8217;t prioritize gaming as much as usability because Steve Jobs and Co are CREATIVES, not gamers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 1/3 queries in 0.003 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 314/315 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via cdn.osxdaily.com

Served from: osxdaily.com @ 2013-05-24 04:08:48 -->