<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Flash Gala plugin with hardware decoding actually performs worse on some Macs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://osxdaily.com/2010/04/30/flash-gala-plugin-with-hardware-decoding-actually-worse-on-some-macs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://osxdaily.com/2010/04/30/flash-gala-plugin-with-hardware-decoding-actually-worse-on-some-macs/</link>
	<description>News, tips, software, reviews, and more for Mac OS X, iPhone, iPad</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 00:49:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wim Pete</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2010/04/30/flash-gala-plugin-with-hardware-decoding-actually-worse-on-some-macs/#comment-103272</link>
		<dc:creator>Wim Pete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 11:35:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=4185#comment-103272</guid>
		<description>Leave it to Apple to make hardware acceleration on Mac OS X such a pain.

It&#039;s not just flash, just look at benchmarks for the newly released STEAM. It appears that Mac OS X was never meant to do fast efficient screen refreshes!

Closing your hardware to third parties doesn&#039;t help either.

Hardware acceleration for flash and other plugins has worked in windows since 1995.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Leave it to Apple to make hardware acceleration on Mac OS X such a pain.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not just flash, just look at benchmarks for the newly released STEAM. It appears that Mac OS X was never meant to do fast efficient screen refreshes!</p>
<p>Closing your hardware to third parties doesn&#8217;t help either.</p>
<p>Hardware acceleration for flash and other plugins has worked in windows since 1995.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harold</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2010/04/30/flash-gala-plugin-with-hardware-decoding-actually-worse-on-some-macs/#comment-101200</link>
		<dc:creator>Harold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 May 2010 01:30:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=4185#comment-101200</guid>
		<description>Leave it to Adobe to finally get direct hardware access after whining about it for so long and then make Flash suck even more. So now that they no longer can blame it on hardware access, what&#039;s the excuse? And how the hell is it even possible to be SLOWER when you have DIRECT access to the hardware? Are there any competent engineers at Adobe?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Leave it to Adobe to finally get direct hardware access after whining about it for so long and then make Flash suck even more. So now that they no longer can blame it on hardware access, what&#8217;s the excuse? And how the hell is it even possible to be SLOWER when you have DIRECT access to the hardware? Are there any competent engineers at Adobe?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: STEVE JOBBYS</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2010/04/30/flash-gala-plugin-with-hardware-decoding-actually-worse-on-some-macs/#comment-101192</link>
		<dc:creator>STEVE JOBBYS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2010 18:41:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=4185#comment-101192</guid>
		<description>HAHA! Hardware acceleration and you *STILL* suck! Die Flash die!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HAHA! Hardware acceleration and you *STILL* suck! Die Flash die!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 211/212 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via cdn.osxdaily.com

Served from: osxdaily.com @ 2013-06-17 21:59:44 -->