<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Office 2011 release date is October 26</title>
	<atom:link href="http://osxdaily.com/2010/09/23/office-2011-release-date-is-october-26/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://osxdaily.com/2010/09/23/office-2011-release-date-is-october-26/</link>
	<description>News, tips, software, reviews, and more for Mac OS X, iPhone, iPad</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 16:37:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Free Porn</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2010/09/23/office-2011-release-date-is-october-26/#comment-185229</link>
		<dc:creator>Free Porn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2011 17:59:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=8003#comment-185229</guid>
		<description>The very core of your writing while appearing agreeable at first, did not really sit very well with me personally after some time. Someplace within the sentences you were able to make me a believer unfortunately just for a while. I still have a problem with your jumps in logic and one would do nicely to fill in those gaps. When you actually can accomplish that, I will undoubtedly end up being fascinated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The very core of your writing while appearing agreeable at first, did not really sit very well with me personally after some time. Someplace within the sentences you were able to make me a believer unfortunately just for a while. I still have a problem with your jumps in logic and one would do nicely to fill in those gaps. When you actually can accomplish that, I will undoubtedly end up being fascinated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gp</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2010/09/23/office-2011-release-date-is-october-26/#comment-118379</link>
		<dc:creator>gp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Sep 2010 01:30:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=8003#comment-118379</guid>
		<description>it isn&#039;t beta, check it out at the following link http://bit.ly/9wRAHv</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it isn&#8217;t beta, check it out at the following link <a href="http://bit.ly/9wRAHv" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/9wRAHv</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Northrope</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2010/09/23/office-2011-release-date-is-october-26/#comment-118119</link>
		<dc:creator>James Northrope</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2010 21:59:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=8003#comment-118119</guid>
		<description>He is likely using the beta. The Office 2011 Mac Beta has been around for a while. I&#039;ve used it a bit at the office and I must say it is one of the better Microsoft products released to the Mac platform in years.

It is a needed upgrade. Excel is still the best spreadsheet and number crunching program available. Numbers just isn&#039;t there yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He is likely using the beta. The Office 2011 Mac Beta has been around for a while. I&#8217;ve used it a bit at the office and I must say it is one of the better Microsoft products released to the Mac platform in years.</p>
<p>It is a needed upgrade. Excel is still the best spreadsheet and number crunching program available. Numbers just isn&#8217;t there yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2010/09/23/office-2011-release-date-is-october-26/#comment-118116</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2010 21:26:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=8003#comment-118116</guid>
		<description>How do you have it now ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How do you have it now ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2010/09/23/office-2011-release-date-is-october-26/#comment-118003</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2010 10:36:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=8003#comment-118003</guid>
		<description>Ive got it now!  Very very nice smooth and sleek interface and quick.
Outlook is amazing, so much better than the abortion that was Entourage.
Very impressed</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ive got it now!  Very very nice smooth and sleek interface and quick.<br />
Outlook is amazing, so much better than the abortion that was Entourage.<br />
Very impressed</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 1/3 queries in 0.003 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 233/234 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via cdn.osxdaily.com

Served from: osxdaily.com @ 2013-06-19 10:25:09 -->