<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Will the next MacBook Pro get Quad-Core Sandy Bridge chips?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://osxdaily.com/2010/12/16/next-macbook-pro-quad-core-sandy-bridge/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://osxdaily.com/2010/12/16/next-macbook-pro-quad-core-sandy-bridge/</link>
	<description>News, tips, software, reviews, and more for Mac OS X, iPhone, iPad</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 21:00:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry Vaughn</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2010/12/16/next-macbook-pro-quad-core-sandy-bridge/#comment-168352</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry Vaughn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2011 02:30:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=10977#comment-168352</guid>
		<description>Sandy Bridge problems

http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2379241,00.asp</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sandy Bridge problems</p>
<p><a href="http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2379241,00.asp" rel="nofollow">http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2379241,00.asp</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Migdalia Wattenberg</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2010/12/16/next-macbook-pro-quad-core-sandy-bridge/#comment-167893</link>
		<dc:creator>Migdalia Wattenberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Feb 2011 04:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=10977#comment-167893</guid>
		<description>It’s actually a cool and helpful piece of information. I am happy that you just shared this helpful information with us. Please keep us up to date like this. Thanks for sharing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It’s actually a cool and helpful piece of information. I am happy that you just shared this helpful information with us. Please keep us up to date like this. Thanks for sharing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dinjin201</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2010/12/16/next-macbook-pro-quad-core-sandy-bridge/#comment-155000</link>
		<dc:creator>Dinjin201</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Dec 2010 20:25:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=10977#comment-155000</guid>
		<description>Since Intel and Nvidia reached a settlement, the new Sandy Bridge chips shouldn&#039;t interfere with Nvidia GPU&#039;s. So, it&#039;s pretty safe to assume that the 13&quot; macbook pros will have up-to-date CPU&#039;s and GPU&#039;s. Furthermore, I would love to see blade-style SSD&#039;s standard in all Macbook pros - even if the price rises by around $100 because there will me ample room for a large battery, meaning an increase to maybe 8-9 hours using apple&#039;s NEW battery tests - ones that actually simulate real-life conditions (the MBA&#039;s actually GET 7 hours)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since Intel and Nvidia reached a settlement, the new Sandy Bridge chips shouldn&#8217;t interfere with Nvidia GPU&#8217;s. So, it&#8217;s pretty safe to assume that the 13&#8243; macbook pros will have up-to-date CPU&#8217;s and GPU&#8217;s. Furthermore, I would love to see blade-style SSD&#8217;s standard in all Macbook pros &#8211; even if the price rises by around $100 because there will me ample room for a large battery, meaning an increase to maybe 8-9 hours using apple&#8217;s NEW battery tests &#8211; ones that actually simulate real-life conditions (the MBA&#8217;s actually GET 7 hours)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fishcake21</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2010/12/16/next-macbook-pro-quad-core-sandy-bridge/#comment-151911</link>
		<dc:creator>Fishcake21</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Dec 2010 04:07:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=10977#comment-151911</guid>
		<description>Remember why the 13 inch stuck with core 2 duo? It was said because of the architecture able to fit in them.  Apple needed something good with graphics drivers for stuff like open gl, and the nvidia gt320 was up to date, because at the same time intel and invida couldn&#039;t make a combination in one die like Optimus which uses the late 9400m.  But to apple having a core 2 duo won&#039;t be a big deal as long as it has GPU support.  I wonder how Sandy bridge will act</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Remember why the 13 inch stuck with core 2 duo? It was said because of the architecture able to fit in them.  Apple needed something good with graphics drivers for stuff like open gl, and the nvidia gt320 was up to date, because at the same time intel and invida couldn&#8217;t make a combination in one die like Optimus which uses the late 9400m.  But to apple having a core 2 duo won&#8217;t be a big deal as long as it has GPU support.  I wonder how Sandy bridge will act</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2010/12/16/next-macbook-pro-quad-core-sandy-bridge/#comment-147699</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2010 23:52:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=10977#comment-147699</guid>
		<description>Yes, with Apple&#039;s OS X Lion on its way out next year it may be a great year for the humble Macintosh next year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, with Apple&#8217;s OS X Lion on its way out next year it may be a great year for the humble Macintosh next year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alsatian</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2010/12/16/next-macbook-pro-quad-core-sandy-bridge/#comment-147561</link>
		<dc:creator>Alsatian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2010 13:56:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=10977#comment-147561</guid>
		<description>YES I will buy one!

I really hope they all get flash drives too. Oh and move the MBA and MBP 13&quot; away from C2D chips, finally.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>YES I will buy one!</p>
<p>I really hope they all get flash drives too. Oh and move the MBA and MBP 13&#8243; away from C2D chips, finally.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 1/3 queries in 0.003 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 244/245 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via cdn.osxdaily.com

Served from: osxdaily.com @ 2013-05-20 20:19:21 -->