<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Alleged &#8220;iPhone Nano&#8221; Screen and Cases Available for an Unreleased Product?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://osxdaily.com/2011/03/17/alleged-iphone-nano-screen-case/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://osxdaily.com/2011/03/17/alleged-iphone-nano-screen-case/</link>
	<description>News, tips, software, reviews, and more for Mac OS X, iPhone, iPad</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 23:13:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mongol</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2011/03/17/alleged-iphone-nano-screen-case/#comment-346421</link>
		<dc:creator>Mongol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 15:34:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=13986#comment-346421</guid>
		<description>Wow iphone nano 5. Really..... This like</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow iphone nano 5. Really&#8230;.. This like</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Frost</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2011/03/17/alleged-iphone-nano-screen-case/#comment-183175</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Frost</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2011 20:35:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=13986#comment-183175</guid>
		<description>Except they are.
The latest version of iPod nano is multitouch.  Small, but multitouch.  This could simply be a bigger version of it.
Or maybe they&#039;re making a nano phone.  Only time will tell.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Except they are.<br />
The latest version of iPod nano is multitouch.  Small, but multitouch.  This could simply be a bigger version of it.<br />
Or maybe they&#8217;re making a nano phone.  Only time will tell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2011/03/17/alleged-iphone-nano-screen-case/#comment-183157</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2011 19:21:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=13986#comment-183157</guid>
		<description>Except that iPod nano screens aren&#039;t touch. 

What makes it suspect to me is that the seller page is keyword stuffing for all smartphones, they could be trying to sell anything to anyone who will buy it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Except that iPod nano screens aren&#8217;t touch. </p>
<p>What makes it suspect to me is that the seller page is keyword stuffing for all smartphones, they could be trying to sell anything to anyone who will buy it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2011/03/17/alleged-iphone-nano-screen-case/#comment-183153</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2011 19:07:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=13986#comment-183153</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s an LCD from the fifth-generation iPod nano, not an iPhone nano.

And you seem to be confusing things talking about a lack of a home button.  This is simply the LCD, not the digitizer panel that would contain a hole for a home button.

And iPhone nano cases have been floating around forever...obviously none of them have ever pannedout.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s an LCD from the fifth-generation iPod nano, not an iPhone nano.</p>
<p>And you seem to be confusing things talking about a lack of a home button.  This is simply the LCD, not the digitizer panel that would contain a hole for a home button.</p>
<p>And iPhone nano cases have been floating around forever&#8230;obviously none of them have ever pannedout.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: magic</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2011/03/17/alleged-iphone-nano-screen-case/#comment-183143</link>
		<dc:creator>magic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2011 18:22:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=13986#comment-183143</guid>
		<description>Do you think a manufacturer is going to bother mass producing something if they don&#039;t have at least *somewhat* reliable information on an upcoming product? There&#039;s a lot of money on the line, this is why there are so many leaks out of China, accessory manufacturers want to be the first to have products available when something hits the stores.

What I think is really interesting is that they don&#039;t say the parts are for an iPhone 5 or an iPhone Nano, they combine the two.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you think a manufacturer is going to bother mass producing something if they don&#8217;t have at least *somewhat* reliable information on an upcoming product? There&#8217;s a lot of money on the line, this is why there are so many leaks out of China, accessory manufacturers want to be the first to have products available when something hits the stores.</p>
<p>What I think is really interesting is that they don&#8217;t say the parts are for an iPhone 5 or an iPhone Nano, they combine the two.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 1/3 queries in 0.002 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 233/234 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via cdn.osxdaily.com

Served from: osxdaily.com @ 2013-05-23 22:21:54 -->