<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Launching an iOS App in Mac OS X Gives an Interesting Error Message</title>
	<atom:link href="http://osxdaily.com/2011/04/07/launching-an-ios-app-in-mac-os-x-gives-an-interesting-error-message/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://osxdaily.com/2011/04/07/launching-an-ios-app-in-mac-os-x-gives-an-interesting-error-message/</link>
	<description>News, tips, software, reviews, and more for Mac OS X, iPhone, iPad</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 21:04:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russ Frantz</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2011/04/07/launching-an-ios-app-in-mac-os-x-gives-an-interesting-error-message/#comment-409766</link>
		<dc:creator>Russ Frantz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2012 13:37:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=14639#comment-409766</guid>
		<description>Thank you for the postings-the Mac users are so different than the traditional IBM Clone users-they actually offer reasonable solutions!  Recently I learned that the iPod comes with 32Gb, but almost 1Gb is used exclusively for the Touch capability.  Many desktop PCs and perhaps even laptops come with 4Gb, especially the WalMart ones.  It may take a very robust computer in order to run the touch layer on a Mac.  Apple has always been known for superior graphics, however.  Is the touch layer even affordable?  Russ</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for the postings-the Mac users are so different than the traditional IBM Clone users-they actually offer reasonable solutions!  Recently I learned that the iPod comes with 32Gb, but almost 1Gb is used exclusively for the Touch capability.  Many desktop PCs and perhaps even laptops come with 4Gb, especially the WalMart ones.  It may take a very robust computer in order to run the touch layer on a Mac.  Apple has always been known for superior graphics, however.  Is the touch layer even affordable?  Russ</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ix.Mac.MarketingName Reference Appears and Disappears from iOS App Store</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2011/04/07/launching-an-ios-app-in-mac-os-x-gives-an-interesting-error-message/#comment-190547</link>
		<dc:creator>ix.Mac.MarketingName Reference Appears and Disappears from iOS App Store</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Apr 2011 16:06:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=14639#comment-190547</guid>
		<description>[...] This whole thing is interesting to me, especially in light of the recent Apple patents and interesting error message that you get when you try to launch an iOS app under Mac OS X (which, however, is the same message [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This whole thing is interesting to me, especially in light of the recent Apple patents and interesting error message that you get when you try to launch an iOS app under Mac OS X (which, however, is the same message [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: methionine_</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2011/04/07/launching-an-ios-app-in-mac-os-x-gives-an-interesting-error-message/#comment-189369</link>
		<dc:creator>methionine_</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 11:02:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=14639#comment-189369</guid>
		<description>iOS and Mac OS X all run a version of Darwin. Subsequently, both of them use the Mach-O binary format. The Mach-O format specification requires that the CPU architecture is stated in the header. The reason you see that error is because Snow Leopard can only run Intel (x86/x86_64) binaries, or if you have Rosetta, PPC binaries. The iOS apps also use the Mach-O binary format. However, their CPU architecture is ARM, which Snow Leopard can&#039;t run as it isn&#039;t running on an ARM machine, nor does it have an translation layer such as Rosetta. As such, it gives the error message you see. If you were to compile any application for any other architecture and try to run it on SL, you would get the same exact message.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>iOS and Mac OS X all run a version of Darwin. Subsequently, both of them use the Mach-O binary format. The Mach-O format specification requires that the CPU architecture is stated in the header. The reason you see that error is because Snow Leopard can only run Intel (x86/x86_64) binaries, or if you have Rosetta, PPC binaries. The iOS apps also use the Mach-O binary format. However, their CPU architecture is ARM, which Snow Leopard can&#8217;t run as it isn&#8217;t running on an ARM machine, nor does it have an translation layer such as Rosetta. As such, it gives the error message you see. If you were to compile any application for any other architecture and try to run it on SL, you would get the same exact message.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: inket</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2011/04/07/launching-an-ios-app-in-mac-os-x-gives-an-interesting-error-message/#comment-189162</link>
		<dc:creator>inket</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2011 19:04:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=14639#comment-189162</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s what you get when you try to run an x86_64 app on PPC. (Here you&#039;re trying to a run an ARM app on x86_64)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s what you get when you try to run an x86_64 app on PPC. (Here you&#8217;re trying to a run an ARM app on x86_64)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2011/04/07/launching-an-ios-app-in-mac-os-x-gives-an-interesting-error-message/#comment-189140</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2011 18:02:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=14639#comment-189140</guid>
		<description>If you try to run an app designed only for Intel-based macs on a PPC (i.e. G5), the same error happens.  I wouldn&#039;t read into this at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you try to run an app designed only for Intel-based macs on a PPC (i.e. G5), the same error happens.  I wouldn&#8217;t read into this at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beams</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2011/04/07/launching-an-ios-app-in-mac-os-x-gives-an-interesting-error-message/#comment-189135</link>
		<dc:creator>Beams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2011 17:59:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=14639#comment-189135</guid>
		<description>iOS is based on Mac OS X so really the iOS apps are Mac OS apps. Future Macs will probably run them natively in a touch layer is my theory.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>iOS is based on Mac OS X so really the iOS apps are Mac OS apps. Future Macs will probably run them natively in a touch layer is my theory.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 1/3 queries in 0.003 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 244/245 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via cdn.osxdaily.com

Served from: osxdaily.com @ 2013-06-19 03:04:11 -->