Comments on: The Original iPhone? Apple Phone Patent from 1985 http://osxdaily.com/2011/04/29/apple-phone-patent-1985/ News, tips, software, reviews, and more for Mac OS X, iPhone, iPad Fri, 24 May 2013 05:38:39 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: Marcos http://osxdaily.com/2011/04/29/apple-phone-patent-1985/#comment-377384 Marcos Sat, 14 Apr 2012 12:45:19 +0000 http://osxdaily.com/?p=15448#comment-377384 Jesus! Jesus!

]]> By: The Original Apple iPhone… from 1983 http://osxdaily.com/2011/04/29/apple-phone-patent-1985/#comment-376608 The Original Apple iPhone… from 1983 Fri, 13 Apr 2012 16:34:17 +0000 http://osxdaily.com/?p=15448#comment-376608 [...] this one looks much more useful than the silly looking literal Apple phone from 1985, which was shaped like an actual Apple logo. stLight.options({ [...] [...] this one looks much more useful than the silly looking literal Apple phone from 1985, which was shaped like an actual Apple logo. stLight.options({ [...]

]]> By: Amy http://osxdaily.com/2011/04/29/apple-phone-patent-1985/#comment-202183 Amy Tue, 07 Jun 2011 19:24:28 +0000 http://osxdaily.com/?p=15448#comment-202183 Hey. That looks like the apple logo. lol Hey. That looks like the apple logo. lol

]]> By: tzs http://osxdaily.com/2011/04/29/apple-phone-patent-1985/#comment-194004 tzs Sat, 30 Apr 2011 08:42:51 +0000 http://osxdaily.com/?p=15448#comment-194004 PS: there is a Wikipedia article on Marvin Glass & Associates here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marvin_Glass_and_Associates Their work was mostly in toys. My guess is that this was a design for a kid's phone. PS: there is a Wikipedia article on Marvin Glass & Associates here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marvin_Glass_and_Associates

Their work was mostly in toys. My guess is that this was a design for a kid’s phone.

]]> By: tzs http://osxdaily.com/2011/04/29/apple-phone-patent-1985/#comment-194003 tzs Sat, 30 Apr 2011 08:38:14 +0000 http://osxdaily.com/?p=15448#comment-194003 First, just to be clear, this is a design patent. Design patents basically cover the ornamental design of a product, not the functionality or technology. Anyway, the company that got this patent was not Apple. It was Marvin Glass & Associates. First, just to be clear, this is a design patent. Design patents basically cover the ornamental design of a product, not the functionality or technology.

Anyway, the company that got this patent was not Apple. It was Marvin Glass & Associates.

]]>