<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Quick Fix to Prevent dscl Unauthorized Password Changes in OS X Lion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://osxdaily.com/2011/09/21/quick-fix-to-prevent-dscl-unauthorized-password-changes-in-os-x-lion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://osxdaily.com/2011/09/21/quick-fix-to-prevent-dscl-unauthorized-password-changes-in-os-x-lion/</link>
	<description>News, tips, software, reviews, and more for Mac OS X, iPhone, iPad</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 21:40:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mac OS X Lion 10.7.1の致命的なセキュリティーホール &#124; tomography</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2011/09/21/quick-fix-to-prevent-dscl-unauthorized-password-changes-in-os-x-lion/#comment-244085</link>
		<dc:creator>Mac OS X Lion 10.7.1の致命的なセキュリティーホール &#124; tomography</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 14:26:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=21450#comment-244085</guid>
		<description>[...] より発見。 Lionで以前のパスワードを知らなくてもユーザーパスワードを変更できる方法がOS X Dailyに掲載されていましたので紹介します。 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] より発見。 Lionで以前のパスワードを知らなくてもユーザーパスワードを変更できる方法がOS X Dailyに掲載されていましたので紹介します。 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2011/09/21/quick-fix-to-prevent-dscl-unauthorized-password-changes-in-os-x-lion/#comment-241655</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2011 16:51:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=21450#comment-241655</guid>
		<description>Nothing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nothing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2011/09/21/quick-fix-to-prevent-dscl-unauthorized-password-changes-in-os-x-lion/#comment-241609</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2011 14:51:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=21450#comment-241609</guid>
		<description>If you do the &quot;chmod go-x&quot; method, what&#039;s to stop someone from doing the following?

cp /usr/bin/dscl /tmp/
chmod a+x /tmp/dscl
/tmp/dscl

And even if you &quot;chmod 100&quot;, what&#039;s to stop someone from using a copy of dscl they have on a flash drive or their web site?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you do the &#8220;chmod go-x&#8221; method, what&#8217;s to stop someone from doing the following?</p>
<p>cp /usr/bin/dscl /tmp/<br />
chmod a+x /tmp/dscl<br />
/tmp/dscl</p>
<p>And even if you &#8220;chmod 100&#8243;, what&#8217;s to stop someone from using a copy of dscl they have on a flash drive or their web site?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 手动修复 Lion 随意更改用户密码漏洞</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2011/09/21/quick-fix-to-prevent-dscl-unauthorized-password-changes-in-os-x-lion/#comment-241519</link>
		<dc:creator>手动修复 Lion 随意更改用户密码漏洞</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2011 10:03:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=21450#comment-241519</guid>
		<description>[...] Inspired by OSXDaily [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Inspired by OSXDaily [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FroZnShiva</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2011/09/21/quick-fix-to-prevent-dscl-unauthorized-password-changes-in-os-x-lion/#comment-241461</link>
		<dc:creator>FroZnShiva</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2011 07:52:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=21450#comment-241461</guid>
		<description>I set the permissions of dscl (used go-x) - after that the prefpane of the application GlimmerBlocker stopped working - always said, that the gb-proxy is not installed.

Fixed this by reenabling the permissions (go+x).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I set the permissions of dscl (used go-x) &#8211; after that the prefpane of the application GlimmerBlocker stopped working &#8211; always said, that the gb-proxy is not installed.</p>
<p>Fixed this by reenabling the permissions (go+x).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: adam</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2011/09/21/quick-fix-to-prevent-dscl-unauthorized-password-changes-in-os-x-lion/#comment-241425</link>
		<dc:creator>adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2011 06:28:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=21450#comment-241425</guid>
		<description>I have chomped /var/db/.AppleSetupDone too,
a easy way to become the superuser on all OsX ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have chomped /var/db/.AppleSetupDone too,<br />
a easy way to become the superuser on all OsX <img src='http://cdn.osxdaily.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: big time hero</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2011/09/21/quick-fix-to-prevent-dscl-unauthorized-password-changes-in-os-x-lion/#comment-241344</link>
		<dc:creator>big time hero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2011 01:03:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=21450#comment-241344</guid>
		<description>Used chmod 700 instead, good trick until the update comes out</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Used chmod 700 instead, good trick until the update comes out</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MU</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2011/09/21/quick-fix-to-prevent-dscl-unauthorized-password-changes-in-os-x-lion/#comment-241276</link>
		<dc:creator>MU</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2011 21:15:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=21450#comment-241276</guid>
		<description>@ Jim T - Agreed - already set mine to: &quot;sudo chmod -v 700 /usr/bin/dscl&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Jim T &#8211; Agreed &#8211; already set mine to: &#8220;sudo chmod -v 700 /usr/bin/dscl&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim T</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2011/09/21/quick-fix-to-prevent-dscl-unauthorized-password-changes-in-os-x-lion/#comment-241007</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim T</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2011 17:35:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=21450#comment-241007</guid>
		<description>Please please -please- do not encourage changing permissions this way using octal codes. Because right off the bat, you&#039;re setting the root permission to 1 (execute only), whereas it was previously 7 (root can read, write, and execute), and the group/other permission to nothing, when they could previously read it. Note how when you change it back you set it to 755. 

Admittedly, it&#039;s (probably?) irrelevant in this case, but it&#039;s a terrible habit to get into. Instead, do this:

sudo chmod go-x /usr/bin/dscl

That will -only- remove the execute permission on group and other, leaving the other permissions (read &amp; write, and root&#039;s full permissions) completely as was before the change. To reverse, do:

sudo chmod go+x /usr/bin/dscl

Only touch the stuff you need to touch!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please please -please- do not encourage changing permissions this way using octal codes. Because right off the bat, you&#8217;re setting the root permission to 1 (execute only), whereas it was previously 7 (root can read, write, and execute), and the group/other permission to nothing, when they could previously read it. Note how when you change it back you set it to 755. </p>
<p>Admittedly, it&#8217;s (probably?) irrelevant in this case, but it&#8217;s a terrible habit to get into. Instead, do this:</p>
<p>sudo chmod go-x /usr/bin/dscl</p>
<p>That will -only- remove the execute permission on group and other, leaving the other permissions (read &amp; write, and root&#8217;s full permissions) completely as was before the change. To reverse, do:</p>
<p>sudo chmod go+x /usr/bin/dscl</p>
<p>Only touch the stuff you need to touch!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mario</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2011/09/21/quick-fix-to-prevent-dscl-unauthorized-password-changes-in-os-x-lion/#comment-241004</link>
		<dc:creator>Mario</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2011 17:14:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=21450#comment-241004</guid>
		<description>As soon as you repair permissions, the old permissions are going to be restored.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As soon as you repair permissions, the old permissions are going to be restored.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jitterbug</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2011/09/21/quick-fix-to-prevent-dscl-unauthorized-password-changes-in-os-x-lion/#comment-241000</link>
		<dc:creator>Jitterbug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2011 17:08:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=21450#comment-241000</guid>
		<description>If a pest already has physical access to a machine there are so many ways around passwords that it doesn&#039;t matter if you change permissions or not. The reason this is valid is that, theoretically, some annoyer app could change a users password and lock them out of their own machine for a few minutes, which would be annoying but easily recoverable. As usual, the techno web is making a big deal out of nothing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If a pest already has physical access to a machine there are so many ways around passwords that it doesn&#8217;t matter if you change permissions or not. The reason this is valid is that, theoretically, some annoyer app could change a users password and lock them out of their own machine for a few minutes, which would be annoying but easily recoverable. As usual, the techno web is making a big deal out of nothing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 1/3 queries in 0.002 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 303/304 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via cdn.osxdaily.com

Served from: osxdaily.com @ 2013-05-22 12:47:19 -->