<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Quad-Core ARM CPU Support Found in Xcode, Quickly Removed by Apple</title>
	<atom:link href="http://osxdaily.com/2011/09/23/quad-core-arm-cpu-support-found-in-xcode/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://osxdaily.com/2011/09/23/quad-core-arm-cpu-support-found-in-xcode/</link>
	<description>News, tips, software, reviews, and more for Mac OS X, iPhone, iPad</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 19:52:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: iPad 3 to be Released in March with Sharper Screen, Quad-Core CPU, and 4G LTE</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2011/09/23/quad-core-arm-cpu-support-found-in-xcode/#comment-315267</link>
		<dc:creator>iPad 3 to be Released in March with Sharper Screen, Quad-Core CPU, and 4G LTE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 22:33:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=21552#comment-315267</guid>
		<description>[...] resolution, double the current iPad&#8217;s screen of 1024&#215;768, and the quad-core CPU has been hinted at in a variety of ways. The biggest news here, if true, may be the addition of 4G LTE network [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] resolution, double the current iPad&#8217;s screen of 1024&#215;768, and the quad-core CPU has been hinted at in a variety of ways. The biggest news here, if true, may be the addition of 4G LTE network [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stewart</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2011/09/23/quad-core-arm-cpu-support-found-in-xcode/#comment-243599</link>
		<dc:creator>Stewart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2011 14:13:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=21552#comment-243599</guid>
		<description>I wonder why Apple work with Intel on Thunderbolt!  I would think it would work out best for both Apple and Intel - to work together - after all Intel could gain from Apple&#039;s low power experience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder why Apple work with Intel on Thunderbolt!  I would think it would work out best for both Apple and Intel &#8211; to work together &#8211; after all Intel could gain from Apple&#8217;s low power experience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stewart</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2011/09/23/quad-core-arm-cpu-support-found-in-xcode/#comment-243598</link>
		<dc:creator>Stewart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2011 14:10:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=21552#comment-243598</guid>
		<description>The 2011 ones are latest generation Intel CPU - my Guess is that Apple might have thought about it before but i5/i7 would make that decision pointless.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 2011 ones are latest generation Intel CPU &#8211; my Guess is that Apple might have thought about it before but i5/i7 would make that decision pointless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stewart</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2011/09/23/quad-core-arm-cpu-support-found-in-xcode/#comment-243596</link>
		<dc:creator>Stewart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2011 14:07:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=21552#comment-243596</guid>
		<description>I hope Apple is not stupid enough to make an ARM based MacBook AIR - is it powerful enough to run compiler tools - NO.  Even if it 16 cores - it will still be slower than this 2010 MBA I am typing this on.

I assume this is likely the A6 or A7 planned for 2012/2013

The big question has iOS been enhanced to handle multiple cores.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope Apple is not stupid enough to make an ARM based MacBook AIR &#8211; is it powerful enough to run compiler tools &#8211; NO.  Even if it 16 cores &#8211; it will still be slower than this 2010 MBA I am typing this on.</p>
<p>I assume this is likely the A6 or A7 planned for 2012/2013</p>
<p>The big question has iOS been enhanced to handle multiple cores.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2011/09/23/quad-core-arm-cpu-support-found-in-xcode/#comment-242395</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Sep 2011 01:02:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=21552#comment-242395</guid>
		<description>Considering whenever they roll them out they&#039;d be comparable to the low end Intels in the Macbook Airs is my guess.   It&#039;s not like the Airs are beast machines right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Considering whenever they roll them out they&#8217;d be comparable to the low end Intels in the Macbook Airs is my guess.   It&#8217;s not like the Airs are beast machines right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2011/09/23/quad-core-arm-cpu-support-found-in-xcode/#comment-242305</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 20:22:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=21552#comment-242305</guid>
		<description>Remove what now?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Remove what now?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LukasMendez</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2011/09/23/quad-core-arm-cpu-support-found-in-xcode/#comment-242295</link>
		<dc:creator>LukasMendez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 19:47:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=21552#comment-242295</guid>
		<description>How do you remove this again? :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How do you remove this again? <img src='http://cdn.osxdaily.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Knows</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2011/09/23/quad-core-arm-cpu-support-found-in-xcode/#comment-242286</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Knows</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 19:34:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=21552#comment-242286</guid>
		<description>ARM is much slower but Apple will make a load of money if they use their own processors. It&#039;s bound to happen folks, get used to it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ARM is much slower but Apple will make a load of money if they use their own processors. It&#8217;s bound to happen folks, get used to it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nascent</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2011/09/23/quad-core-arm-cpu-support-found-in-xcode/#comment-242212</link>
		<dc:creator>nascent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 16:58:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=21552#comment-242212</guid>
		<description>I really don&#039;t want ARM Macs, they will be so much slower than anything Intel offers =(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really don&#8217;t want ARM Macs, they will be so much slower than anything Intel offers =(</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 2/3 queries in 0.002 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 282/282 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via cdn.osxdaily.com

Served from: osxdaily.com @ 2013-05-22 18:29:16 -->