<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Will the iPhone Always Have a 3.5&#8243; Screen?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://osxdaily.com/2011/10/10/will-the-iphone-always-have-a-3-5-screen/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://osxdaily.com/2011/10/10/will-the-iphone-always-have-a-3-5-screen/</link>
	<description>News, tips, software, reviews, and more for Mac OS X, iPhone, iPad</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 19:31:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: khang</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2011/10/10/will-the-iphone-always-have-a-3-5-screen/#comment-316037</link>
		<dc:creator>khang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2012 05:32:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=22190#comment-316037</guid>
		<description>when people say quality of screen they must mean the retinal display of  960 x 600 solution for a 3.5 inch vs a 800 x 480 on a 4.5 samsung galaxy s 2</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>when people say quality of screen they must mean the retinal display of  960 x 600 solution for a 3.5 inch vs a 800 x 480 on a 4.5 samsung galaxy s 2</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: james</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2011/10/10/will-the-iphone-always-have-a-3-5-screen/#comment-260792</link>
		<dc:creator>james</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Oct 2011 18:13:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=22190#comment-260792</guid>
		<description>This is the stupidest article ever hahahha. You say apple would have made a 4 inch screen back in 06? Not even that would cost a lot of money and a 3.5 inch was already really big for a phone. And second to everyone saying that the quality of the screen is more important that BS cause all high end android phones all have good quality screens and there way bigger!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the stupidest article ever hahahha. You say apple would have made a 4 inch screen back in 06? Not even that would cost a lot of money and a 3.5 inch was already really big for a phone. And second to everyone saying that the quality of the screen is more important that BS cause all high end android phones all have good quality screens and there way bigger!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Renato</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2011/10/10/will-the-iphone-always-have-a-3-5-screen/#comment-258193</link>
		<dc:creator>Renato</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2011 16:06:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=22190#comment-258193</guid>
		<description>You are just wrong. I&#039;m fine with the iPhone screen size.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are just wrong. I&#8217;m fine with the iPhone screen size.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WTF</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2011/10/10/will-the-iphone-always-have-a-3-5-screen/#comment-255706</link>
		<dc:creator>WTF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2011 22:40:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=22190#comment-255706</guid>
		<description>Get an Android phone and move on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Get an Android phone and move on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WTF</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2011/10/10/will-the-iphone-always-have-a-3-5-screen/#comment-255703</link>
		<dc:creator>WTF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2011 22:38:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=22190#comment-255703</guid>
		<description>Yes, when iPhone was released in 2006, it was catching up with all the multi-touch smartphones at the time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, when iPhone was released in 2006, it was catching up with all the multi-touch smartphones at the time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WTF</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2011/10/10/will-the-iphone-always-have-a-3-5-screen/#comment-255701</link>
		<dc:creator>WTF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2011 22:37:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=22190#comment-255701</guid>
		<description>Get an Android.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Get an Android.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WTF</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2011/10/10/will-the-iphone-always-have-a-3-5-screen/#comment-255699</link>
		<dc:creator>WTF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2011 22:36:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=22190#comment-255699</guid>
		<description>Might as well get a tablet at that point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Might as well get a tablet at that point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WTF</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2011/10/10/will-the-iphone-always-have-a-3-5-screen/#comment-255698</link>
		<dc:creator>WTF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2011 22:35:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=22190#comment-255698</guid>
		<description>Bigger screen uses more battery.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bigger screen uses more battery.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WTF</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2011/10/10/will-the-iphone-always-have-a-3-5-screen/#comment-255697</link>
		<dc:creator>WTF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2011 22:34:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=22190#comment-255697</guid>
		<description>iPad is not a phone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>iPad is not a phone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dustin</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2011/10/10/will-the-iphone-always-have-a-3-5-screen/#comment-252998</link>
		<dc:creator>Dustin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 12:59:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=22190#comment-252998</guid>
		<description>If they make the screen larger without making the phone larger, then all is good. But I really don&#039;t want to carry a wide screen T.V. in my pants. I hope Apple never increases the actual size of the phone itself, just the screen. Also, if it comes at too much of an expense to battery life, then I&#039;d prefer the smaller screen anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If they make the screen larger without making the phone larger, then all is good. But I really don&#8217;t want to carry a wide screen T.V. in my pants. I hope Apple never increases the actual size of the phone itself, just the screen. Also, if it comes at too much of an expense to battery life, then I&#8217;d prefer the smaller screen anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iPhone 会一直保持3.5英寸屏幕吗？ &#124; 果迷网</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2011/10/10/will-the-iphone-always-have-a-3-5-screen/#comment-252718</link>
		<dc:creator>iPhone 会一直保持3.5英寸屏幕吗？ &#124; 果迷网</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 01:29:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=22190#comment-252718</guid>
		<description>[...] via OSXDaily [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] via OSXDaily [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2011/10/10/will-the-iphone-always-have-a-3-5-screen/#comment-252699</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 00:37:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=22190#comment-252699</guid>
		<description>Well, the next obvious step is to transform the nature of hardware.  We need phones that are bendable rollable or foldable.  It&#039;s possible that such a design wouldn&#039;t be exactly ergonomic, but it would be convenient to be able to roll up our phone to stash it somewhere.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, the next obvious step is to transform the nature of hardware.  We need phones that are bendable rollable or foldable.  It&#8217;s possible that such a design wouldn&#8217;t be exactly ergonomic, but it would be convenient to be able to roll up our phone to stash it somewhere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vdiv</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2011/10/10/will-the-iphone-always-have-a-3-5-screen/#comment-252442</link>
		<dc:creator>vdiv</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 17:38:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=22190#comment-252442</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re stuck with the plasma then, or wear baggier jeans :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re stuck with the plasma then, or wear baggier jeans <img src='http://cdn.osxdaily.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2011/10/10/will-the-iphone-always-have-a-3-5-screen/#comment-252434</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 17:29:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=22190#comment-252434</guid>
		<description>All of these pundits and fanboys who are proclaiming the 3.5&quot; screen to be the holiest and most perfect size are going to be saying the exact same thing next year when Apple releases a 4&quot; version of the iPhone. Then suddenly the 4&quot; version is going to be perfect and holy and will get rejoiced by the same fanboys who will then be in direct contradiction with their past statements. 

This is what I HATE about the fanboy Apple pundits, they flipflop on anything as long as it&#039;s 100% in agreement with every Apple release and product ever. 

Look, I love Apple too, but I can openly admit when they underwhelm or release something that isn&#039;t the best. There&#039;s nothing wrong with healthy criticism, but people like Gruber and Curtis and all the other goobers who are saying the 3.5&quot; is Jesus himself are just flat out ridiculous.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All of these pundits and fanboys who are proclaiming the 3.5&#8243; screen to be the holiest and most perfect size are going to be saying the exact same thing next year when Apple releases a 4&#8243; version of the iPhone. Then suddenly the 4&#8243; version is going to be perfect and holy and will get rejoiced by the same fanboys who will then be in direct contradiction with their past statements. </p>
<p>This is what I HATE about the fanboy Apple pundits, they flipflop on anything as long as it&#8217;s 100% in agreement with every Apple release and product ever. </p>
<p>Look, I love Apple too, but I can openly admit when they underwhelm or release something that isn&#8217;t the best. There&#8217;s nothing wrong with healthy criticism, but people like Gruber and Curtis and all the other goobers who are saying the 3.5&#8243; is Jesus himself are just flat out ridiculous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Parsi Monious</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2011/10/10/will-the-iphone-always-have-a-3-5-screen/#comment-252395</link>
		<dc:creator>Parsi Monious</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 16:04:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=22190#comment-252395</guid>
		<description>Mr. Curtis went through all this effort to express a biased opinion? And you post it as if it where a study? Is there any statistical analysis available for review? This is all silly to say the least. 

IF he does have a theory, then he should at least do some decent study to support it. At least some data collection and a regression analysis. Here, I volunteer the first sample in the data set:

I&#039;ve used iPhones since they first came out. I do a lot of internet browsing, app usage and email. My thumb measures 3.25 inches, and my user satisfaction level with the iPhone screen size is 5 on a scale of 0 to 10 (and it keeps getting lower with time). 

I think the iPhone 4S specs are  nice to have, but overall they fall short. 512MB of RAM is not enough. Once I reach certain level of multitasking I need to start killing apps to keep the UI from slowing down. And the screen size, well the screen size.....what can I say? I have a big, fat long thumb. Bye, Bye my precious. It&#039;s been a pleasure.....

And Mr. Curtis, please curb your enthusiasm.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Curtis went through all this effort to express a biased opinion? And you post it as if it where a study? Is there any statistical analysis available for review? This is all silly to say the least. </p>
<p>IF he does have a theory, then he should at least do some decent study to support it. At least some data collection and a regression analysis. Here, I volunteer the first sample in the data set:</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve used iPhones since they first came out. I do a lot of internet browsing, app usage and email. My thumb measures 3.25 inches, and my user satisfaction level with the iPhone screen size is 5 on a scale of 0 to 10 (and it keeps getting lower with time). </p>
<p>I think the iPhone 4S specs are  nice to have, but overall they fall short. 512MB of RAM is not enough. Once I reach certain level of multitasking I need to start killing apps to keep the UI from slowing down. And the screen size, well the screen size&#8230;..what can I say? I have a big, fat long thumb. Bye, Bye my precious. It&#8217;s been a pleasure&#8230;..</p>
<p>And Mr. Curtis, please curb your enthusiasm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 1/3 queries in 0.005 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 347/348 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via cdn.osxdaily.com

Served from: osxdaily.com @ 2013-05-18 15:27:40 -->