<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Enable and Use the &#8216;locate&#8217; Command in the Mac OS X Terminal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://osxdaily.com/2011/11/02/enable-and-use-the-locate-command-in-the-mac-os-x-terminal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://osxdaily.com/2011/11/02/enable-and-use-the-locate-command-in-the-mac-os-x-terminal/</link>
	<description>News, tips, software, reviews, and more for Mac OS X, iPhone, iPad</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 09:32:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2011/11/02/enable-and-use-the-locate-command-in-the-mac-os-x-terminal/#comment-514398</link>
		<dc:creator>steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2013 11:03:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=23271#comment-514398</guid>
		<description>Did you know what&#039;s below from manual locate, isn&#039;t it?.

”The locate database is typically built by user «nobody» and the locate.updatedb(8) utility skips directories which are not readable for user «nobody», group «nobody», or world.  For example, if your HOME directory is not world-readable, none of your files are in the database” 

I didn&#039;t know it...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you know what&#8217;s below from manual locate, isn&#8217;t it?.</p>
<p>”The locate database is typically built by user «nobody» and the locate.updatedb(8) utility skips directories which are not readable for user «nobody», group «nobody», or world.  For example, if your HOME directory is not world-readable, none of your files are in the database” </p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t know it&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: apanloco</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2011/11/02/enable-and-use-the-locate-command-in-the-mac-os-x-terminal/#comment-488873</link>
		<dc:creator>apanloco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2013 15:37:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=23271#comment-488873</guid>
		<description>mdfind -- thank you so much!! I have never managed to get locate to work on my Mountain Lion installation. (It&#039;s enabled, but  locate doesn&#039;t return files that I know are there)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mdfind &#8212; thank you so much!! I have never managed to get locate to work on my Mountain Lion installation. (It&#8217;s enabled, but  locate doesn&#8217;t return files that I know are there)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chejux</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2011/11/02/enable-and-use-the-locate-command-in-the-mac-os-x-terminal/#comment-435907</link>
		<dc:creator>Chejux</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2012 17:25:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=23271#comment-435907</guid>
		<description>I didn&#039;t know about mdfind - Thank you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t know about mdfind &#8211; Thank you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: munjee</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2011/11/02/enable-and-use-the-locate-command-in-the-mac-os-x-terminal/#comment-310561</link>
		<dc:creator>munjee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 20:43:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=23271#comment-310561</guid>
		<description>Is there really a point to bother with locate anymore since it&#039;s possible to use &#039;mdfind&#039; (md=metadata) to search the Spotlight index? Mdfind also shows results from folders that the crippled piece of crap known as Spotlight (the GUI version that is) does not show.

mdfind hosts</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there really a point to bother with locate anymore since it&#8217;s possible to use &#8216;mdfind&#8217; (md=metadata) to search the Spotlight index? Mdfind also shows results from folders that the crippled piece of crap known as Spotlight (the GUI version that is) does not show.</p>
<p>mdfind hosts</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Arnstein</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2011/11/02/enable-and-use-the-locate-command-in-the-mac-os-x-terminal/#comment-268082</link>
		<dc:creator>David Arnstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2011 04:01:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=23271#comment-268082</guid>
		<description>Yikes! I made a mistake. Let me try again.

In your example, it is better to escape the asterisk. Your call to “locate” will fail if there exists a .jpg file in the current working directory. It is better to type

locate -i &#039;*.jpg&#039;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yikes! I made a mistake. Let me try again.</p>
<p>In your example, it is better to escape the asterisk. Your call to “locate” will fail if there exists a .jpg file in the current working directory. It is better to type</p>
<p>locate -i &#8216;*.jpg&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2011/11/02/enable-and-use-the-locate-command-in-the-mac-os-x-terminal/#comment-268009</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2011 00:59:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=23271#comment-268009</guid>
		<description>Locate really is a great tool, too bad Locator X 0.7.3 (UI on top of locate) isn&#039;t available anymore.

I&#039;ve been using &quot;toucan search&quot; (app store) and I&#039;ve been very pleased with it.  It is as fast as locate and it has a UI so it is more convenient to use (the only thing missing is the ability to search the content of files).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Locate really is a great tool, too bad Locator X 0.7.3 (UI on top of locate) isn&#8217;t available anymore.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been using &#8220;toucan search&#8221; (app store) and I&#8217;ve been very pleased with it.  It is as fast as locate and it has a UI so it is more convenient to use (the only thing missing is the ability to search the content of files).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: adam</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2011/11/02/enable-and-use-the-locate-command-in-the-mac-os-x-terminal/#comment-267899</link>
		<dc:creator>adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2011 19:11:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=23271#comment-267899</guid>
		<description>The Rosetta Miss,
It&#039;s hard to buy every software at every new computer…
But I use Lion, and yes is not the best OS X, but is not really bad too…</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Rosetta Miss,<br />
It&#8217;s hard to buy every software at every new computer…<br />
But I use Lion, and yes is not the best OS X, but is not really bad too…</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brandon</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2011/11/02/enable-and-use-the-locate-command-in-the-mac-os-x-terminal/#comment-267832</link>
		<dc:creator>Brandon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2011 17:16:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=23271#comment-267832</guid>
		<description>Still using Snow Leopard eh? Glad to see I&#039;m not alone, Lion has so many quirks with the over simplification it&#039;s hard to use it in a production environment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Still using Snow Leopard eh? Glad to see I&#8217;m not alone, Lion has so many quirks with the over simplification it&#8217;s hard to use it in a production environment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 1/3 queries in 0.003 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 266/267 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via cdn.osxdaily.com

Served from: osxdaily.com @ 2013-05-25 07:32:03 -->