<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: iPad Mini Rumors Return, 7.8&#8243; Screen with a Launch in Fall of 2012?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://osxdaily.com/2011/12/15/ipad-mini-rumors-return-7-8-screen-with-a-launch-in-fall-of-2012/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://osxdaily.com/2011/12/15/ipad-mini-rumors-return-7-8-screen-with-a-launch-in-fall-of-2012/</link>
	<description>News, tips, software, reviews, and more for Mac OS X, iPhone, iPad</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 21:37:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Your Momma</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2011/12/15/ipad-mini-rumors-return-7-8-screen-with-a-launch-in-fall-of-2012/#comment-344675</link>
		<dc:creator>Your Momma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 00:28:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=24935#comment-344675</guid>
		<description>I think Apple is trying to replace the Amazon Kindle Fire by making this mini iPad, so it should cost around the same as the Fire.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Apple is trying to replace the Amazon Kindle Fire by making this mini iPad, so it should cost around the same as the Fire.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Smaller iPad with 8&#8243; Display Being Tested by Apple</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2011/12/15/ipad-mini-rumors-return-7-8-screen-with-a-launch-in-fall-of-2012/#comment-335966</link>
		<dc:creator>Smaller iPad with 8&#8243; Display Being Tested by Apple</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 18:28:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=24935#comment-335966</guid>
		<description>[...] working on smaller iPads, or &#8220;iPad Mini&#8220;, have existed for quite some time, with a recent report from DigiTimes stating such a device could ship in the fourth quarter of this [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] working on smaller iPads, or &#8220;iPad Mini&#8220;, have existed for quite some time, with a recent report from DigiTimes stating such a device could ship in the fourth quarter of this [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ignatius Reilly</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2011/12/15/ipad-mini-rumors-return-7-8-screen-with-a-launch-in-fall-of-2012/#comment-302927</link>
		<dc:creator>Ignatius Reilly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 15:51:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=24935#comment-302927</guid>
		<description>iPod Touch Maxi or iPad Mini?

I just don&#039;t see it. Why carry around another device that&#039;s only slightly larger than the iPhone you (presumably) already have? It would have to have a retina display to make it worthwhile, and at that point, you&#039;re probably looking at $500.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>iPod Touch Maxi or iPad Mini?</p>
<p>I just don&#8217;t see it. Why carry around another device that&#8217;s only slightly larger than the iPhone you (presumably) already have? It would have to have a retina display to make it worthwhile, and at that point, you&#8217;re probably looking at $500.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dorje Sylas</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2011/12/15/ipad-mini-rumors-return-7-8-screen-with-a-launch-in-fall-of-2012/#comment-300920</link>
		<dc:creator>Dorje Sylas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 22:25:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=24935#comment-300920</guid>
		<description>I agree with Benizia. I&#039;d believe a 4 inch iPhone/iPod Touch over 7 inch iPad. It doesn&#039;t fit anywhere in Apple&#039;s price structure, it really is just a tad too small for vertical portrait reading (held horizontal landscape you can get a good view, but you have to scroll up and down in a two column layout.

It just doesn&#039;t feel like a good size.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Benizia. I&#8217;d believe a 4 inch iPhone/iPod Touch over 7 inch iPad. It doesn&#8217;t fit anywhere in Apple&#8217;s price structure, it really is just a tad too small for vertical portrait reading (held horizontal landscape you can get a good view, but you have to scroll up and down in a two column layout.</p>
<p>It just doesn&#8217;t feel like a good size.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Benizia</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2011/12/15/ipad-mini-rumors-return-7-8-screen-with-a-launch-in-fall-of-2012/#comment-300681</link>
		<dc:creator>Benizia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 08:41:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=24935#comment-300681</guid>
		<description>I am skeptical of the 7&quot; form factor based on what Steve Jobs said in the past, recall the comments on shaving down your finger tips... plus some of the issues with reading on the Kindle Fire with smaller text. Here is what I think is going to happen instead:

-- iPad 3 with retina display is out in April, sells for $499 and up

-- iPad 2 16 GB stays on the market as a lower cost option, priced at $399

It&#039;s the iPhone family of products approach going to the iPad line, it&#039;s bound to happen. Where would a 7&quot; fit into this? At $299? That is an unlikely price point, too close to the iPod touch. At $399 it would be still 2x the cost of Kindle Fire, and would match the price of the hypothetical new iPad 2 base model, so that is equally unlikely. 

Apple isn&#039;t going to race the tablet market to the bottom on price. Amazon is losing money on each Kindle sale, hoping to make it up on purchases, but that isn&#039;t the profit model of Apple. Thus, a $199 iPad 7&quot; is never going to happen, and a $299 model is unlikely to be possible given the iPod touch. And why offer something at that price point when ultimately the device they want to sell is $399?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am skeptical of the 7&#8243; form factor based on what Steve Jobs said in the past, recall the comments on shaving down your finger tips&#8230; plus some of the issues with reading on the Kindle Fire with smaller text. Here is what I think is going to happen instead:</p>
<p>&#8211; iPad 3 with retina display is out in April, sells for $499 and up</p>
<p>&#8211; iPad 2 16 GB stays on the market as a lower cost option, priced at $399</p>
<p>It&#8217;s the iPhone family of products approach going to the iPad line, it&#8217;s bound to happen. Where would a 7&#8243; fit into this? At $299? That is an unlikely price point, too close to the iPod touch. At $399 it would be still 2x the cost of Kindle Fire, and would match the price of the hypothetical new iPad 2 base model, so that is equally unlikely. </p>
<p>Apple isn&#8217;t going to race the tablet market to the bottom on price. Amazon is losing money on each Kindle sale, hoping to make it up on purchases, but that isn&#8217;t the profit model of Apple. Thus, a $199 iPad 7&#8243; is never going to happen, and a $299 model is unlikely to be possible given the iPod touch. And why offer something at that price point when ultimately the device they want to sell is $399?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 1/3 queries in 0.003 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 234/234 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via cdn.osxdaily.com

Served from: osxdaily.com @ 2013-05-22 06:36:09 -->