<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More Evidence for Retina Display Macs Shows up in OS X 10.7.3 Beta</title>
	<atom:link href="http://osxdaily.com/2011/12/21/more-evidence-for-retina-display-macs-shows-up-in-os-x-10-7-3-beta/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://osxdaily.com/2011/12/21/more-evidence-for-retina-display-macs-shows-up-in-os-x-10-7-3-beta/</link>
	<description>News, tips, software, reviews, and more for Mac OS X, iPhone, iPad</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 20:42:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2011/12/21/more-evidence-for-retina-display-macs-shows-up-in-os-x-10-7-3-beta/#comment-315273</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 22:56:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=25160#comment-315273</guid>
		<description>Actually, grandpa, maybe there is something to get excited about. When the resolution gets so good you can&#039;t distinguish the screen from a printed page maybe that&#039;s a sort of a tipping point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, grandpa, maybe there is something to get excited about. When the resolution gets so good you can&#8217;t distinguish the screen from a printed page maybe that&#8217;s a sort of a tipping point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: New OS X 10.7.3 Build 11D42 Released to Developers</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2011/12/21/more-evidence-for-retina-display-macs-shows-up-in-os-x-10-7-3-beta/#comment-313440</link>
		<dc:creator>New OS X 10.7.3 Build 11D42 Released to Developers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 03:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=25160#comment-313440</guid>
		<description>[...] first beta of OS X 10.7.3 showed up in November of last year, with later releases showing hints of retina Macs and drivers for graphics cards that are not currently shipping on [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] first beta of OS X 10.7.3 showed up in November of last year, with later releases showing hints of retina Macs and drivers for graphics cards that are not currently shipping on [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: clasqm</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2011/12/21/more-evidence-for-retina-display-macs-shows-up-in-os-x-10-7-3-beta/#comment-303236</link>
		<dc:creator>clasqm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 08:05:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=25160#comment-303236</guid>
		<description>Screen resolutions have been going steadily higher for years. Listen youngsters, grandpa can remember when 800x600 was considered hi-res. So there&#039;s no reason to think that process will stop any time soon. Just because at some semi-arbitrary level the new resolution gets a fancy new name is no real reason to get excited.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Screen resolutions have been going steadily higher for years. Listen youngsters, grandpa can remember when 800&#215;600 was considered hi-res. So there&#8217;s no reason to think that process will stop any time soon. Just because at some semi-arbitrary level the new resolution gets a fancy new name is no real reason to get excited.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2011/12/21/more-evidence-for-retina-display-macs-shows-up-in-os-x-10-7-3-beta/#comment-303081</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 21:18:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=25160#comment-303081</guid>
		<description>All signs are pointing at next year. I wish it would come in the Air, but I am betting the retina ppi is going to be what delineates the Pro from the Air line.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All signs are pointing at next year. I wish it would come in the Air, but I am betting the retina ppi is going to be what delineates the Pro from the Air line.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2011/12/21/more-evidence-for-retina-display-macs-shows-up-in-os-x-10-7-3-beta/#comment-303072</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 20:51:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=25160#comment-303072</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s inevitable but I hope it&#039;s soon I need to upgrade my 2008 macbook.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s inevitable but I hope it&#8217;s soon I need to upgrade my 2008 macbook.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 1/3 queries in 0.003 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 233/234 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via cdn.osxdaily.com

Served from: osxdaily.com @ 2013-05-25 23:13:44 -->