<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Firefox 10 Released to Download</title>
	<atom:link href="http://osxdaily.com/2012/01/31/firefox-10-released-to-download/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://osxdaily.com/2012/01/31/firefox-10-released-to-download/</link>
	<description>News, tips, software, reviews, and more for Mac OS X, iPhone, iPad</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 19:31:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Firefox 10 è ora disponibile al download! &#124; iSpazio MAC</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2012/01/31/firefox-10-released-to-download/#comment-327826</link>
		<dc:creator>Firefox 10 è ora disponibile al download! &#124; iSpazio MAC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 08:15:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=26608#comment-327826</guid>
		<description>[...]  Via&#124;OSXDaily [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  Via|OSXDaily [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2012/01/31/firefox-10-released-to-download/#comment-327794</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 07:18:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=26608#comment-327794</guid>
		<description>Is it a 100% Cocoa app now that supports Services? If not, won&#039;t bother.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it a 100% Cocoa app now that supports Services? If not, won&#8217;t bother.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OSXDaily</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2012/01/31/firefox-10-released-to-download/#comment-327714</link>
		<dc:creator>OSXDaily</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 05:10:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=26608#comment-327714</guid>
		<description>https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/omnibar/

Fixed, sorry about that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/omnibar/" rel="nofollow">https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/omnibar/</a></p>
<p>Fixed, sorry about that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: forrest</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2012/01/31/firefox-10-released-to-download/#comment-327622</link>
		<dc:creator>forrest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 03:47:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=26608#comment-327622</guid>
		<description>the link for Chrome style Omnibar add-on is incorrect, it points to Firefox download, could anyone fix it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the link for Chrome style Omnibar add-on is incorrect, it points to Firefox download, could anyone fix it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2012/01/31/firefox-10-released-to-download/#comment-327323</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 17:41:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=26608#comment-327323</guid>
		<description>&quot;Apple stopped supporting non-Intel Macs a few years back…therefore, many application developers followed suit…why would any application developer continue to support non-Intel Macs when even Apple does not support them?&quot;

In that case, Firefox shouldn&#039;t try to update the PPC version.

That Warragul  above states that he had to fish the old version out of trash means that FF did try to update a PPC version with one which doesn&#039;t work.

On the Windows front, Firefox has reverted to a previous behavioiur of downloading and trying to install the update
 from a non-privileged account. They had addressed this one in a previous release, but the old and wrong behaviour is back again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Apple stopped supporting non-Intel Macs a few years back…therefore, many application developers followed suit…why would any application developer continue to support non-Intel Macs when even Apple does not support them?&#8221;</p>
<p>In that case, Firefox shouldn&#8217;t try to update the PPC version.</p>
<p>That Warragul  above states that he had to fish the old version out of trash means that FF did try to update a PPC version with one which doesn&#8217;t work.</p>
<p>On the Windows front, Firefox has reverted to a previous behavioiur of downloading and trying to install the update<br />
 from a non-privileged account. They had addressed this one in a previous release, but the old and wrong behaviour is back again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2012/01/31/firefox-10-released-to-download/#comment-327309</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 16:32:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=26608#comment-327309</guid>
		<description>Apple stopped supporting non-Intel Macs a few years back...therefore, many application developers followed suit...why would any application developer continue to support non-Intel Macs when even Apple does not support them?  When was the last time you saw a worthy update from Apple past Mac OS X 10.5.8?  =)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apple stopped supporting non-Intel Macs a few years back&#8230;therefore, many application developers followed suit&#8230;why would any application developer continue to support non-Intel Macs when even Apple does not support them?  When was the last time you saw a worthy update from Apple past Mac OS X 10.5.8?  =)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vdiv</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2012/01/31/firefox-10-released-to-download/#comment-327278</link>
		<dc:creator>vdiv</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 14:56:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=26608#comment-327278</guid>
		<description>&quot;The now standardized OS X Lion full-screen button&quot; does a horrible job with multiple screens as it blanks out the other screens and yet it has no option of expanding the window onto them.  In general multiscreen/multidesktop support in Lion has been a step back from Snow Leopard and this is kind of ridiculous.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The now standardized OS X Lion full-screen button&#8221; does a horrible job with multiple screens as it blanks out the other screens and yet it has no option of expanding the window onto them.  In general multiscreen/multidesktop support in Lion has been a step back from Snow Leopard and this is kind of ridiculous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Warragul</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2012/01/31/firefox-10-released-to-download/#comment-327215</link>
		<dc:creator>Warragul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 11:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=26608#comment-327215</guid>
		<description>... and it won&#039;t work on my GF&#039;s PPC iMac.
I realize it&#039;s been a while since the Intel Macs arrived but why do Firefox, Skype et al practically force us to download new versions that aren&#039;t for our platform of choice? Naturally, they aren&#039;t Universal and I have to go fishing the older version out of the Trash - if I&#039;m lucky.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230; and it won&#8217;t work on my GF&#8217;s PPC iMac.<br />
I realize it&#8217;s been a while since the Intel Macs arrived but why do Firefox, Skype et al practically force us to download new versions that aren&#8217;t for our platform of choice? Naturally, they aren&#8217;t Universal and I have to go fishing the older version out of the Trash &#8211; if I&#8217;m lucky.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jmorgan93</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2012/01/31/firefox-10-released-to-download/#comment-327203</link>
		<dc:creator>Jmorgan93</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 10:34:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=26608#comment-327203</guid>
		<description>Swiping left and right with 2 fingers on OS X Lion as in Safari now works in this browser.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Swiping left and right with 2 fingers on OS X Lion as in Safari now works in this browser.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marc11</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2012/01/31/firefox-10-released-to-download/#comment-327179</link>
		<dc:creator>marc11</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 08:54:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=26608#comment-327179</guid>
		<description>Another Firefox yawn, wonder how many plug-ins are broken with this release to go with the broken Growl notifications?  Firefox lost me at version 9 when for what seemed like the 4th version in a row too many of my favorite plug-ins stopped working.

Yeah I know the developer needs to make the plug-in compatible, but if there weren`t releases ever month, it would be easier for them to keep up with the changes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another Firefox yawn, wonder how many plug-ins are broken with this release to go with the broken Growl notifications?  Firefox lost me at version 9 when for what seemed like the 4th version in a row too many of my favorite plug-ins stopped working.</p>
<p>Yeah I know the developer needs to make the plug-in compatible, but if there weren`t releases ever month, it would be easier for them to keep up with the changes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amed</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2012/01/31/firefox-10-released-to-download/#comment-327164</link>
		<dc:creator>Amed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 08:12:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=26608#comment-327164</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t believe they&#039;re calling this Firefox 10... I mean it&#039;s a great browser but these are minor changes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t believe they&#8217;re calling this Firefox 10&#8230; I mean it&#8217;s a great browser but these are minor changes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 1/3 queries in 0.003 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 299/300 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via cdn.osxdaily.com

Served from: osxdaily.com @ 2013-05-19 01:28:16 -->