<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How iPad 3&#8242;s Retina Display Resolution Would Compare to Other Screens</title>
	<atom:link href="http://osxdaily.com/2012/02/10/how-ipad-3s-retina-display-resolution-would-compare-to-other-screens/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://osxdaily.com/2012/02/10/how-ipad-3s-retina-display-resolution-would-compare-to-other-screens/</link>
	<description>News, tips, software, reviews, and more for Mac OS X, iPhone, iPad</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 05:38:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: iPad 3 Launch Date Confirmed: March 7</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2012/02/10/how-ipad-3s-retina-display-resolution-would-compare-to-other-screens/#comment-346501</link>
		<dc:creator>iPad 3 Launch Date Confirmed: March 7</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 18:45:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=27051#comment-346501</guid>
		<description>[...] was sent out, Bloomberg has chimed in to confirm that iPad 3 will feature the much expected high-resolution display which is &#8220;capable of greater resolution than the current iPad, with more pixels on its screen [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] was sent out, Bloomberg has chimed in to confirm that iPad 3 will feature the much expected high-resolution display which is &#8220;capable of greater resolution than the current iPad, with more pixels on its screen [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jools</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2012/02/10/how-ipad-3s-retina-display-resolution-would-compare-to-other-screens/#comment-337982</link>
		<dc:creator>Jools</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 07:49:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=27051#comment-337982</guid>
		<description>[NB I&#039;m referring to the 30&quot; version]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[NB I'm referring to the 30" version]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jools</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2012/02/10/how-ipad-3s-retina-display-resolution-would-compare-to-other-screens/#comment-337981</link>
		<dc:creator>Jools</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 07:46:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=27051#comment-337981</guid>
		<description>[...]As we’ve mentioned before, there is currently no Mac screen capable of displaying a resolution of that size natively[...]

Except perhaps a Cinema HD screen - The top 2 listed resolutions available are 2048x1536 and 2560x1600.  Should therefore should pose no &quot;challenge for developers and designers to prepare artwork and apps for the next iPad&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]As we’ve mentioned before, there is currently no Mac screen capable of displaying a resolution of that size natively[...]</p>
<p>Except perhaps a Cinema HD screen &#8211; The top 2 listed resolutions available are 2048&#215;1536 and 2560&#215;1600.  Should therefore should pose no &#8220;challenge for developers and designers to prepare artwork and apps for the next iPad&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Billy</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2012/02/10/how-ipad-3s-retina-display-resolution-would-compare-to-other-screens/#comment-335418</link>
		<dc:creator>Billy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 01:18:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=27051#comment-335418</guid>
		<description>Be realistic - Apple has a policy of keeping the production cost of their products as low as possible - iPad 2 has the same production cost as an iPad, iPhone 4s, 4, 3gs, and the 3g all have lower production costs than the original iPhone. 

How would Apple possibly be able to maintain production costs on the iPad 3 if they include retina display?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Be realistic &#8211; Apple has a policy of keeping the production cost of their products as low as possible &#8211; iPad 2 has the same production cost as an iPad, iPhone 4s, 4, 3gs, and the 3g all have lower production costs than the original iPhone. </p>
<p>How would Apple possibly be able to maintain production costs on the iPad 3 if they include retina display?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Check Out This iPad 3 Retina Display Comparison Graphic &#124; Techno Mondo</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2012/02/10/how-ipad-3s-retina-display-resolution-would-compare-to-other-screens/#comment-334915</link>
		<dc:creator>Check Out This iPad 3 Retina Display Comparison Graphic &#124; Techno Mondo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 10:24:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=27051#comment-334915</guid>
		<description>[...] (via OSXDaily) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] (via OSXDaily) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: How Big Is a Retina Display Compared To Other Screens (Graphic) &#124; TechnoBuffalo</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2012/02/10/how-ipad-3s-retina-display-resolution-would-compare-to-other-screens/#comment-334466</link>
		<dc:creator>How Big Is a Retina Display Compared To Other Screens (Graphic) &#124; TechnoBuffalo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 23:01:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=27051#comment-334466</guid>
		<description>[...] OSXDaily] How Big Is a Retina Display Compared [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] OSXDaily] How Big Is a Retina Display Compared [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MacRumors: An iPad 3 'Retina Display' Comparison Graphic</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2012/02/10/how-ipad-3s-retina-display-resolution-would-compare-to-other-screens/#comment-334161</link>
		<dc:creator>MacRumors: An iPad 3 'Retina Display' Comparison Graphic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 13:26:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=27051#comment-334161</guid>
		<description>[...] An iPad 3 &#039;Retina Display&#039; Comparison Graphic     via macrumors.com:  Clkoerner (via OSXDaily) put together this graphic showing the relative number of pixels offered by various devices, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] An iPad 3 &#039;Retina Display&#039; Comparison Graphic     via macrumors.com:  Clkoerner (via OSXDaily) put together this graphic showing the relative number of pixels offered by various devices, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dean</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2012/02/10/how-ipad-3s-retina-display-resolution-would-compare-to-other-screens/#comment-333343</link>
		<dc:creator>Dean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 22:12:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=27051#comment-333343</guid>
		<description>And the iCones continue to play catchup.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And the iCones continue to play catchup.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: borja</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2012/02/10/how-ipad-3s-retina-display-resolution-would-compare-to-other-screens/#comment-333298</link>
		<dc:creator>borja</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 21:12:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=27051#comment-333298</guid>
		<description>you can&#039;t compare screen resolution with megahertz and things like that. 

The screen resolution for computer displays will indeed STOP at some point once it is large enough to satisfy our eyes&#039; needs completely. Same as happened with audio: we could digitize audio at Megasamples/second, but you never find standard audio systems going over 96 ksamples/second. At some point it will not be anymore about resolution (or sampling rate), but other things such as color quality, contrast, refresh speed, noise level and so. 

Megahertz in computers on the other side have no &quot;it-is-enough&quot; limit. The faster, the more complex things you&#039;ll be able to do, there is no inherent limit to the complexity that you want to achieve. Same for memory, disk size and so on. No limits there!

Another story is talking about display resolution for specialized uses. For example projector that magnifies the image a lot. If you want to enlarge the projection a lot starting with a very little rendering  display, that would indeed require much higher resolution than a screen for our eyes. Or glasses that include a displays(+optics) at 2cm from your eyes, etc etc.  Continuing with the audio example, you have specialized ultrasound audio digitizers going over 96khz for weird purposes, but not to listen Enya or Madonna! :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you can&#8217;t compare screen resolution with megahertz and things like that. </p>
<p>The screen resolution for computer displays will indeed STOP at some point once it is large enough to satisfy our eyes&#8217; needs completely. Same as happened with audio: we could digitize audio at Megasamples/second, but you never find standard audio systems going over 96 ksamples/second. At some point it will not be anymore about resolution (or sampling rate), but other things such as color quality, contrast, refresh speed, noise level and so. </p>
<p>Megahertz in computers on the other side have no &#8220;it-is-enough&#8221; limit. The faster, the more complex things you&#8217;ll be able to do, there is no inherent limit to the complexity that you want to achieve. Same for memory, disk size and so on. No limits there!</p>
<p>Another story is talking about display resolution for specialized uses. For example projector that magnifies the image a lot. If you want to enlarge the projection a lot starting with a very little rendering  display, that would indeed require much higher resolution than a screen for our eyes. Or glasses that include a displays(+optics) at 2cm from your eyes, etc etc.  Continuing with the audio example, you have specialized ultrasound audio digitizers going over 96khz for weird purposes, but not to listen Enya or Madonna! <img src='http://cdn.osxdaily.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Forsberg</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2012/02/10/how-ipad-3s-retina-display-resolution-would-compare-to-other-screens/#comment-333289</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Forsberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 20:27:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=27051#comment-333289</guid>
		<description>Good story, but the silliness of responses is unsettling. I would expect those who comment on Apple product would at least realize what is viewed on the screen would be normalized to the display size.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good story, but the silliness of responses is unsettling. I would expect those who comment on Apple product would at least realize what is viewed on the screen would be normalized to the display size.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vdiv</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2012/02/10/how-ipad-3s-retina-display-resolution-would-compare-to-other-screens/#comment-333257</link>
		<dc:creator>vdiv</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 18:50:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=27051#comment-333257</guid>
		<description>Her name is Siri and she talks behind your back.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Her name is Siri and she talks behind your back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: spyinthesky</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2012/02/10/how-ipad-3s-retina-display-resolution-would-compare-to-other-screens/#comment-333255</link>
		<dc:creator>spyinthesky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 18:42:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=27051#comment-333255</guid>
		<description>Yup just as they did wit cds when we were told early on this is perfect sound.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yup just as they did wit cds when we were told early on this is perfect sound.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michael</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2012/02/10/how-ipad-3s-retina-display-resolution-would-compare-to-other-screens/#comment-333254</link>
		<dc:creator>michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 18:31:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=27051#comment-333254</guid>
		<description>The iPhone 4 has the same screen as the 4S ... so not sure why your phone has worse battery life?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The iPhone 4 has the same screen as the 4S &#8230; so not sure why your phone has worse battery life?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iPad 3 Retina Display Vs. Other Apple Devices Displays [Chart]</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2012/02/10/how-ipad-3s-retina-display-resolution-would-compare-to-other-screens/#comment-333250</link>
		<dc:creator>iPad 3 Retina Display Vs. Other Apple Devices Displays [Chart]</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 18:23:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=27051#comment-333250</guid>
		<description>[...] is from clkoerner and it shows how much pixels the iPad 3 will have. However, Paul Horowitz over at OS X Daily has pointed that such a display would be an intersting challenge for developers who will be [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is from clkoerner and it shows how much pixels the iPad 3 will have. However, Paul Horowitz over at OS X Daily has pointed that such a display would be an intersting challenge for developers who will be [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2012/02/10/how-ipad-3s-retina-display-resolution-would-compare-to-other-screens/#comment-333248</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 18:14:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=27051#comment-333248</guid>
		<description>I suspect battery life is going to suffer. They will advertise as &quot;the same great battery life as before&quot; or something similar, but just like iPhone 4S is not nearly as good as iPhone 4, the battery life will take a 20-30% hit in real usage. That is my bet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suspect battery life is going to suffer. They will advertise as &#8220;the same great battery life as before&#8221; or something similar, but just like iPhone 4S is not nearly as good as iPhone 4, the battery life will take a 20-30% hit in real usage. That is my bet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 1/3 queries in 0.005 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 348/348 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via cdn.osxdaily.com

Served from: osxdaily.com @ 2013-05-24 19:12:57 -->