<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Preview a URL Directly in Mail for Mac OS X</title>
	<atom:link href="http://osxdaily.com/2012/04/17/preview-a-url-directly-in-mail-for-mac-os-x/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://osxdaily.com/2012/04/17/preview-a-url-directly-in-mail-for-mac-os-x/</link>
	<description>News, tips, software, reviews, and more for Mac OS X, iPhone, iPad</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 09:32:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: JP Detroit</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2012/04/17/preview-a-url-directly-in-mail-for-mac-os-x/#comment-442575</link>
		<dc:creator>JP Detroit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2012 14:39:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=29451#comment-442575</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been reading conflicting answers to this online. Some &quot;experts&quot; are sure there&#039;s no way QuickLook follows the links in an email and is completely safe. Other pages say the opposite and there seems to be no consensus on it. Does anyone have a final definitive answer to whether QuickLook is a safe way to preview potentially dangerous links in emails?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been reading conflicting answers to this online. Some &#8220;experts&#8221; are sure there&#8217;s no way QuickLook follows the links in an email and is completely safe. Other pages say the opposite and there seems to be no consensus on it. Does anyone have a final definitive answer to whether QuickLook is a safe way to preview potentially dangerous links in emails?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2012/04/17/preview-a-url-directly-in-mail-for-mac-os-x/#comment-384024</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 00:50:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=29451#comment-384024</guid>
		<description>This feature is also built into the Messages Beta App, for previewing links sent in an iMessage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This feature is also built into the Messages Beta App, for previewing links sent in an iMessage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: me</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2012/04/17/preview-a-url-directly-in-mail-for-mac-os-x/#comment-379115</link>
		<dc:creator>me</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 16:53:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=29451#comment-379115</guid>
		<description>How to disable this little triangle ?
The hovering of it seems to me dangerous onto spam email !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How to disable this little triangle ?<br />
The hovering of it seems to me dangerous onto spam email !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: adam</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2012/04/17/preview-a-url-directly-in-mail-for-mac-os-x/#comment-378961</link>
		<dc:creator>adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 06:42:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=29451#comment-378961</guid>
		<description>Yes, just more quick, but not more secure…</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, just more quick, but not more secure…</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scotty</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2012/04/17/preview-a-url-directly-in-mail-for-mac-os-x/#comment-378954</link>
		<dc:creator>Scotty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 06:18:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=29451#comment-378954</guid>
		<description>Not if you have the newest Java update installed</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not if you have the newest Java update installed</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jake</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2012/04/17/preview-a-url-directly-in-mail-for-mac-os-x/#comment-378950</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 06:03:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=29451#comment-378950</guid>
		<description>Note that this will not be in any way more secure than browsing the website in Safari: QuickLook most probably uses the same engine to render the website as Safari does. So don&#039;t do this for potentially dubious URLs, if you are concerned about security. It is quicker, though :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Note that this will not be in any way more secure than browsing the website in Safari: QuickLook most probably uses the same engine to render the website as Safari does. So don&#8217;t do this for potentially dubious URLs, if you are concerned about security. It is quicker, though <img src='http://cdn.osxdaily.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2012/04/17/preview-a-url-directly-in-mail-for-mac-os-x/#comment-378944</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 05:43:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=29451#comment-378944</guid>
		<description>Is the quick look feature enough for a website to install malicious software in the background?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is the quick look feature enough for a website to install malicious software in the background?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2012/04/17/preview-a-url-directly-in-mail-for-mac-os-x/#comment-378882</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 00:38:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=29451#comment-378882</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s too bad iOS doesn&#039;t do this, it needs it more than Mac OS X</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s too bad iOS doesn&#8217;t do this, it needs it more than Mac OS X</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 1/3 queries in 0.003 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 271/271 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via cdn.osxdaily.com

Served from: osxdaily.com @ 2013-05-25 13:02:18 -->