<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Are These Pictures of the Next iPhone?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://osxdaily.com/2012/05/29/are-these-pictures-of-the-next-iphone/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://osxdaily.com/2012/05/29/are-these-pictures-of-the-next-iphone/</link>
	<description>News, tips, software, reviews, and more for Mac OS X, iPhone, iPad</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 19:52:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2012/05/29/are-these-pictures-of-the-next-iphone/#comment-426536</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Sep 2012 00:03:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=30543#comment-426536</guid>
		<description>These comments are really funny now that it is what actually came out haha</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These comments are really funny now that it is what actually came out haha</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mateus</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2012/05/29/are-these-pictures-of-the-next-iphone/#comment-409226</link>
		<dc:creator>Mateus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2012 17:42:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=30543#comment-409226</guid>
		<description>So, someone made a 3d-render of the iPhone 5 just like this. Now the part leaks and it&#039;s the same thing.
Looks like someone is good at predicting things, he even got the measures right...

(Now, seriously, stop putting these videos, it&#039;s a shame that you really think that&#039;s going to be something like this...)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, someone made a 3d-render of the iPhone 5 just like this. Now the part leaks and it&#8217;s the same thing.<br />
Looks like someone is good at predicting things, he even got the measures right&#8230;</p>
<p>(Now, seriously, stop putting these videos, it&#8217;s a shame that you really think that&#8217;s going to be something like this&#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KrisP.y</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2012/05/29/are-these-pictures-of-the-next-iphone/#comment-395053</link>
		<dc:creator>KrisP.y</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2012 04:01:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=30543#comment-395053</guid>
		<description>On the contrary, I have a theory for the strange discolored stripe down the middle of the thing: either a touch pad (like on the PS Vita [I&#039;m reaching at straws here]) or it is an epic fail of an attempt to get the copyright, apple logo, specs, UL logo, etc. onto the back.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the contrary, I have a theory for the strange discolored stripe down the middle of the thing: either a touch pad (like on the PS Vita [I'm reaching at straws here]) or it is an epic fail of an attempt to get the copyright, apple logo, specs, UL logo, etc. onto the back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KrisP.y</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2012/05/29/are-these-pictures-of-the-next-iphone/#comment-395052</link>
		<dc:creator>KrisP.y</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2012 03:55:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=30543#comment-395052</guid>
		<description>Although at first glance this seemed legit, I noticed the &quot;smaller power adaptor&quot;, and lets just squash some rumors here, that casing includes designs for a 4&quot; display (which was denied by the late Steve Jobs) and a micro USB. Apple would never use a micro USB, because they are rudimentary in design for a battery equivalent to that of the rumored iPhone 5(6?)(which is in fact a fuel cell battery, patented by apple, which is readily available info). A 4 Pin micro USB like the one in this picture and on all Android phones is just not up to par with a fuel cell battery, or the current Apple battery charge rate standards, for that matter. This is why Apple never discontinued the 30-pin Apple USB used in all iDevices (except the shuffle, which is more of an accessory). So no, this is not the iPhone 5(6?)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although at first glance this seemed legit, I noticed the &#8220;smaller power adaptor&#8221;, and lets just squash some rumors here, that casing includes designs for a 4&#8243; display (which was denied by the late Steve Jobs) and a micro USB. Apple would never use a micro USB, because they are rudimentary in design for a battery equivalent to that of the rumored iPhone 5(6?)(which is in fact a fuel cell battery, patented by apple, which is readily available info). A 4 Pin micro USB like the one in this picture and on all Android phones is just not up to par with a fuel cell battery, or the current Apple battery charge rate standards, for that matter. This is why Apple never discontinued the 30-pin Apple USB used in all iDevices (except the shuffle, which is more of an accessory). So no, this is not the iPhone 5(6?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sandro melia</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2012/05/29/are-these-pictures-of-the-next-iphone/#comment-394485</link>
		<dc:creator>sandro melia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jun 2012 18:14:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=30543#comment-394485</guid>
		<description>I hope this are not real photos. Looks just the same as 4g(s) for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope this are not real photos. Looks just the same as 4g(s) for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iapphk</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2012/05/29/are-these-pictures-of-the-next-iphone/#comment-393398</link>
		<dc:creator>iapphk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2012 08:56:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=30543#comment-393398</guid>
		<description>I think &#039;the new iPhone&#039; may have a Optical Zoom Camera, so that&#039;s why the headphone jack have been moved to the bottom of the device. (if the above photos are real)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think &#8216;the new iPhone&#8217; may have a Optical Zoom Camera, so that&#8217;s why the headphone jack have been moved to the bottom of the device. (if the above photos are real)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: icebreaker</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2012/05/29/are-these-pictures-of-the-next-iphone/#comment-393010</link>
		<dc:creator>icebreaker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 07:25:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=30543#comment-393010</guid>
		<description>Finally a smaller connector, the big one was outdated. I doubt that this is a production case as well. The front panel could be the real deal. But Apple is getting the Porsche syndrome, they don&#039;t know how to redesign their products.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Finally a smaller connector, the big one was outdated. I doubt that this is a production case as well. The front panel could be the real deal. But Apple is getting the Porsche syndrome, they don&#8217;t know how to redesign their products.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2012/05/29/are-these-pictures-of-the-next-iphone/#comment-392958</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 04:23:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=30543#comment-392958</guid>
		<description>Looks like a test sled for new internals, but not a production case.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like a test sled for new internals, but not a production case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Francis</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2012/05/29/are-these-pictures-of-the-next-iphone/#comment-392918</link>
		<dc:creator>Francis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 01:27:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=30543#comment-392918</guid>
		<description>4 inch display would be nice, but i dont like how it looks designed, would of been better. the sim looks like 2 sims in 1 like micro and normal, which ever the people have sim card...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>4 inch display would be nice, but i dont like how it looks designed, would of been better. the sim looks like 2 sims in 1 like micro and normal, which ever the people have sim card&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2012/05/29/are-these-pictures-of-the-next-iphone/#comment-392882</link>
		<dc:creator>Don</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2012 23:29:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=30543#comment-392882</guid>
		<description>The sim holder looks to big for a micro sim, why would apple move to micro sims and then move back to normal sim cards :S</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The sim holder looks to big for a micro sim, why would apple move to micro sims and then move back to normal sim cards :S</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2012/05/29/are-these-pictures-of-the-next-iphone/#comment-392840</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2012 21:45:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=30543#comment-392840</guid>
		<description>These look like rendered 3D images with images used as the textures, the laser cut is obviously a photo but look at the rim of the enclosure. Same goes for the back panel shots, looks like a couple images thrown on top of some generic renders. Furthermore, there are now shadows, which would be inconsistent with where the light is coming from at about 5 o&#039;clock.

Also, frankly, it&#039;s too ugly to be a real Apple product.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These look like rendered 3D images with images used as the textures, the laser cut is obviously a photo but look at the rim of the enclosure. Same goes for the back panel shots, looks like a couple images thrown on top of some generic renders. Furthermore, there are now shadows, which would be inconsistent with where the light is coming from at about 5 o&#8217;clock.</p>
<p>Also, frankly, it&#8217;s too ugly to be a real Apple product.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahak29</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2012/05/29/are-these-pictures-of-the-next-iphone/#comment-392839</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahak29</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2012 21:32:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=30543#comment-392839</guid>
		<description>This is definitely a fake.  The port, knowing Apple, wouldn&#039;t be changed.  The matte parts on the back look like battery covers as they extend around the side.  However, this might look like the real thing in many other ways, such as the screen and speaker covers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is definitely a fake.  The port, knowing Apple, wouldn&#8217;t be changed.  The matte parts on the back look like battery covers as they extend around the side.  However, this might look like the real thing in many other ways, such as the screen and speaker covers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SamDS</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2012/05/29/are-these-pictures-of-the-next-iphone/#comment-392833</link>
		<dc:creator>SamDS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2012 21:04:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=30543#comment-392833</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t like the headphone jack on the bottom. and the back kinda looks like a HTC phone that I&#039;m forgetting the name of.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t like the headphone jack on the bottom. and the back kinda looks like a HTC phone that I&#8217;m forgetting the name of.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2012/05/29/are-these-pictures-of-the-next-iphone/#comment-392817</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2012 20:12:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=30543#comment-392817</guid>
		<description>These are definitely fakes. Apple would never make a device with that many parts and lack of uniformity. There&#039;s three parts to the back! Apple doesn&#039;t do that anymore!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These are definitely fakes. Apple would never make a device with that many parts and lack of uniformity. There&#8217;s three parts to the back! Apple doesn&#8217;t do that anymore!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2012/05/29/are-these-pictures-of-the-next-iphone/#comment-392816</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2012 20:07:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=30543#comment-392816</guid>
		<description>I certainly do not like the idea of a new/different power adapter on the bottom. Hopefully that&#039;s going to be changed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I certainly do not like the idea of a new/different power adapter on the bottom. Hopefully that&#8217;s going to be changed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 2/3 queries in 0.003 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 344/344 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via cdn.osxdaily.com

Served from: osxdaily.com @ 2013-06-19 17:52:24 -->