<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Get the Classic iTunes Search List Style Back in iTunes 11</title>
	<atom:link href="http://osxdaily.com/2013/01/25/get-itunes-search-list-style-back/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://osxdaily.com/2013/01/25/get-itunes-search-list-style-back/</link>
	<description>News, tips, software, reviews, and more for Mac OS X, iPhone, iPad</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 19:52:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich W.</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2013/01/25/get-itunes-search-list-style-back/#comment-496470</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich W.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2013 01:08:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=35646#comment-496470</guid>
		<description>&quot;Reduced functionality&quot;? Anticipating variations and providing options is good interface design, so I&#039;d call it &quot;added value&quot;.

Good tip. Toggling &quot;Search entire library&quot; to achieve this wasn&#039;t very intuitive on it&#039;s own.

I&#039;m finding that the dynamic search is slowing iTunes&#039; search response time. I usually prefer dynamic search, as long as it&#039;s fast (Spotlight) or fast enough given the context (Hulu), but I&#039;d rather not search my entire iTunes library based on entering just the first one or two characters if iTunes is going to be so pokey about it. I imagine this problem gets worse for very large libraries.

To be fair, maybe there is, or will be in a future point release, some behind-the-scenes indexing that will make it faster. Until then, thanks for this tip.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Reduced functionality&#8221;? Anticipating variations and providing options is good interface design, so I&#8217;d call it &#8220;added value&#8221;.</p>
<p>Good tip. Toggling &#8220;Search entire library&#8221; to achieve this wasn&#8217;t very intuitive on it&#8217;s own.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m finding that the dynamic search is slowing iTunes&#8217; search response time. I usually prefer dynamic search, as long as it&#8217;s fast (Spotlight) or fast enough given the context (Hulu), but I&#8217;d rather not search my entire iTunes library based on entering just the first one or two characters if iTunes is going to be so pokey about it. I imagine this problem gets worse for very large libraries.</p>
<p>To be fair, maybe there is, or will be in a future point release, some behind-the-scenes indexing that will make it faster. Until then, thanks for this tip.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Mordecai</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2013/01/25/get-itunes-search-list-style-back/#comment-488921</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Mordecai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2013 21:29:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=35646#comment-488921</guid>
		<description>YES! Thank you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>YES! Thank you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allan Rojas</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2013/01/25/get-itunes-search-list-style-back/#comment-486923</link>
		<dc:creator>Allan Rojas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2013 21:23:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=35646#comment-486923</guid>
		<description>amazing tip! thx! keep them coming!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>amazing tip! thx! keep them coming!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2013/01/25/get-itunes-search-list-style-back/#comment-483888</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2013 01:39:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=35646#comment-483888</guid>
		<description>Yup, as others have said. Just press return to get the list of results instead of the popover. Best of both worlds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yup, as others have said. Just press return to get the list of results instead of the popover. Best of both worlds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gareth</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2013/01/25/get-itunes-search-list-style-back/#comment-483557</link>
		<dc:creator>Gareth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2013 14:22:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=35646#comment-483557</guid>
		<description>Excellent tip - many thanks, makes iTunes more useable again. I love progress, but not at the expense of functionality/quickness.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent tip &#8211; many thanks, makes iTunes more useable again. I love progress, but not at the expense of functionality/quickness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alberto</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2013/01/25/get-itunes-search-list-style-back/#comment-482754</link>
		<dc:creator>Alberto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2013 16:28:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=35646#comment-482754</guid>
		<description>*This* is why I like OsXdaily!!!
:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*This* is why I like OsXdaily!!!<br />
 <img src='http://cdn.osxdaily.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MickM</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2013/01/25/get-itunes-search-list-style-back/#comment-482014</link>
		<dc:creator>MickM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2013 17:42:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=35646#comment-482014</guid>
		<description>Thank you for the tip - that missing functionality was the biggest thing that was bugging me about the new iTunes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for the tip &#8211; that missing functionality was the biggest thing that was bugging me about the new iTunes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: banger</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2013/01/25/get-itunes-search-list-style-back/#comment-481742</link>
		<dc:creator>banger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2013 08:53:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=35646#comment-481742</guid>
		<description>doh!.... can&#039;t delete my comment but it appears I was w...w... wer... wer.... mistaken...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>doh!&#8230;. can&#8217;t delete my comment but it appears I was w&#8230;w&#8230; wer&#8230; wer&#8230;. mistaken&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: banger</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2013/01/25/get-itunes-search-list-style-back/#comment-481737</link>
		<dc:creator>banger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2013 08:46:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=35646#comment-481737</guid>
		<description>hmmm..... why can&#039;t I find anything from compilations this way?.... doesn&#039;t work...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hmmm&#8230;.. why can&#8217;t I find anything from compilations this way?&#8230;. doesn&#8217;t work&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Skipper E</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2013/01/25/get-itunes-search-list-style-back/#comment-481450</link>
		<dc:creator>Skipper E</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 23:27:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=35646#comment-481450</guid>
		<description>Sweet baby FSM, this is what I&#039;ve been wanting ever since the update. Thank you a million times!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sweet baby FSM, this is what I&#8217;ve been wanting ever since the update. Thank you a million times!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ronald Lanham</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2013/01/25/get-itunes-search-list-style-back/#comment-481418</link>
		<dc:creator>Ronald Lanham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 22:35:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=35646#comment-481418</guid>
		<description>Excellent tip!!

Thank you, thank you, thank you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent tip!!</p>
<p>Thank you, thank you, thank you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2013/01/25/get-itunes-search-list-style-back/#comment-481373</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 20:50:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=35646#comment-481373</guid>
		<description>Good tip from my perspective.  Returned the functionality that was irritably missing in my iTunes app.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good tip from my perspective.  Returned the functionality that was irritably missing in my iTunes app.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Curt</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2013/01/25/get-itunes-search-list-style-back/#comment-481359</link>
		<dc:creator>Curt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 20:24:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=35646#comment-481359</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t know what your talking about. This actually reduces functionality as the previous comments point out. If you just hit enter you get to see the results like the ways of old, and if not, you can push the down arrow and select more discreet results right away...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t know what your talking about. This actually reduces functionality as the previous comments point out. If you just hit enter you get to see the results like the ways of old, and if not, you can push the down arrow and select more discreet results right away&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2013/01/25/get-itunes-search-list-style-back/#comment-481324</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 19:40:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=35646#comment-481324</guid>
		<description>When I hit enter my song starts playing in Up Next. Why does iTunes 11 UI complicate longstanding UX tradition?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I hit enter my song starts playing in Up Next. Why does iTunes 11 UI complicate longstanding UX tradition?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://osxdaily.com/2013/01/25/get-itunes-search-list-style-back/#comment-481308</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 19:25:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osxdaily.com/?p=35646#comment-481308</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been doing what marinomarcoma said (just type and hit Enter) and it does not show the Up Next thing.  It filters your current view, be it TV Shows, Music, Movies, whatever, based on your text entered.

I haven&#039;t installed anything screwy, or tweaked any settings or defaults or anything.  I&#039;m not sure why it doesn&#039;t work for you, but it works on my Macs (all of them) just fine.  Strange.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been doing what marinomarcoma said (just type and hit Enter) and it does not show the Up Next thing.  It filters your current view, be it TV Shows, Music, Movies, whatever, based on your text entered.</p>
<p>I haven&#8217;t installed anything screwy, or tweaked any settings or defaults or anything.  I&#8217;m not sure why it doesn&#8217;t work for you, but it works on my Macs (all of them) just fine.  Strange.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 1/3 queries in 0.005 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 347/348 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via cdn.osxdaily.com

Served from: osxdaily.com @ 2013-06-19 18:32:19 -->